Aims Patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) have an increased risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT), with slow conducting anatomical isthmus (SCAI) 3 as dominant VT substrate. In patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), SCAI 3 leads to local activation delay with a shift of terminal RV activation towards the lateral RV outflow tract which may be detected by terminal QRS vector changes on sinus rhythm electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods and results Consecutive rTOF patients aged ≥16 years with RBBB who underwent electroanatomical mapping at our institution between 2017–2022 and 2010–2016 comprised the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. Forty-six patients were included in the derivation cohort (aged 40±15 years, QRS duration 165±23 ms). Among patients with SCAI 3 (n = 31, 67%), 17 (55%) had an R″ in V1, 18 (58%) had a negative terminal QRS portion (NTP) ≥80 ms in aVF, and 12 (39%) had both ECG characteristics, compared to only 1 (7%), 1 (7%), and 0 patient without SCAI, respectively. Combining R″ in V1 and/or NTP ≥80 ms in aVF into a diagnostic algorithm resulted in a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 87% in detecting SCAI 3. The inter-observer agreement for the diagnostic algorithm was 0.875. In the validation cohort [n = 33, 18 (55%) with SCAI 3], the diagnostic algorithm had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 80% for identifying SCAI 3. Conclusion A sinus rhythm ECG-based algorithm including R″ in V1 and/or NTP ≥80 ms in aVF can identify rTOF patients with a SCAI 3 and may contribute to non-invasive risk stratification for VT.

No abstract

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and monomorphic, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) are considered to be at risk for arrhythmia-related sudden cardiac death (SCD). Prior studies have suggested that patients with well-tolerated VTs and preserved or moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and successful VT ablation may not benefit from cardioverter defibrillator implantation (ICD Current guidelines indicate that in selected patients catheter ablation should be considered instead of ICD, but supporting evidence is limited. Aim This study aims to analyze arrhythmia outcomes of ICM patients referred for VT ablation without prior ICD implantation according to LVEF, hemodynamical stability during VT and ablation outcome. Methods ICM patients without prior ICD implantation undergoing VT ablation in a tertiary center between 2009 and 2022 were included. Patients who presented with a first episode of tolerated VT and w a LVEF≥35% were offered catheter ablation (CA) as first-line therapy. Patients were categorized according to (1) LVEF, (2) clinical presentation (hemodynamically tolerated/non-tolerated VT) and (3) acute ablation outcome. According to the institutional protocol, ICD was offered to all patients after ablation, but was subject to shared decision making, explaining the available evidence supporting ICDs for the different categories. Results Eighty-six ICM patients without ICD underwent ablation for VT. Mean age was 69±9 years and 72 (84%) were men, mean LVEF was 41±9% and 34 patients (28%) were using anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD). The median VT cycle length (VTCL) at presentation was 323ms [300 – 375] and VT was tolerated in 58 (67%) patients (median tolerated VTCL 325ms [300 – 371]). In 66 (77%) patients, the LVEF was ≥35% of which 51 had well-tolerated VT. Of these 51 patients, 37 (73%) were rendered non-inducible after ablation and in 14 patients non-clinical VTs remained inducible (median remaining VTCL 238ms [203-288]). In 5/37 non-inducible and in 11/14 inducible patients, an ICD was implanted. Of the 35 patients who had LVEF<35% and/or non-tolerated VTs, 7 refused ICD implantation. (Figure 1) During a median follow-up of 35 [22 – 53] months, 10 patients (12%) had VT-recurrence and one patient with an ICD had SCD. Mortality was 22%. In the 37 patients with LVEF≥35%, tolerated VT and non-inducibility post procedure, no SCD or VT-recurrence was observed. Also, in this group no patient was using AAD for VT at last follow-up. In the 14 remaining patients with LVEF≥35% and tolerated VT who were still inducible after ablation, no SCD occurred but VT recurred in 29% (median VTCL 303ms [200-374]) with AAD-use for VT in 29%. Conclusion This study supports that ICM patients without prior ICD and LVEF≥35% who present with hemodynamically well-tolerated VT and are non-inducible after ablation have an excellent prognosis. Successful CA without ICD implantation seems to be safe in these selected patients.

BACKGROUND: In dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), outcome after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is modest, compared with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Pleomorphic VT (PL-VT) has been associated with fibrotic remodeling and end-stage heart failure in IHD. The prognostic role of PL-VT in DCM is unknown. METHODS: Consecutive IHD (2009–2016) or DCM (2008–2018) patients undergoing ablation for monomorphic VT were included. PL-VT was defined as ≥1 spontaneous change of the 12-lead VT-morphology during the same induced VT episode. Patients were followed for VT recurrence and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (86% men; 63±13 years; IHD n=152; DCM n=95) underwent ablation for monomorphic VT. PL-VT was observed in 22 and 29 patients with IHD and DCM, respectively (14% versus 31%, P =0.003). In IHD, PL-VT was associated with lower LVEF (28±9% versus 34±12%, P =0.02) and only observed in those with LVEF<40%. In contrast, in DCM, PL-VT was not related to LVEF and induced in 27% of patients with LVEF>40%. During a median follow-up of 30 months, 79 (32%) patients died (IHD 48; DCM 31; P =0.88) and 120 (49%) had VT recurrence (IHD 59; DCM 61; P <0.001). PL-VT was associated with mortality in IHD but not in DCM. In IHD, VT recurrence was independently associated with LVEF, number of induced VTs, and procedural noncomplete success. Of note, in DCM, PL-VT (HR, 2.62 [95% CI, 1.47–4.69]), pathogenic mutation (HR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.16–3.91]), and anteroseptal VT substrate (HR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.00–3.07]) independently predicted VT recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In IHD, PL-VT was associated with low LVEF and mortality. In DCM, PL-VT was not associated with mortality but a predictor of VT recurrence independent from LVEF. PL-VT in DCM may indicate a specific arrhythmic substrate difficult to control by current ablation techniques.