By retrospectively analyzing 288 patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we sought to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of bone marrow eosinophilia and basophilia that were detected at presentation. Bone marrow eosinophilia and basophilia were defined as a differential count of each cell type exceeding 5.0% and 1.0%, respectively. Of 288 patients with MDS, 36 (12.5%) fulfilled this criterion for bone marrow eosinophilia (MDS-Eos); 34 patients (11.8%) showed basophilia (MDS-Bas), and 11 (3.8%) satisfied both criteria (MDSEosBas). The remaining 229 patients had neither eosinophilia nor basophilia in their bone marrow (MDS ؊/؊ ) at presentation. Cytogenetic analysis was carried out on unstimulated bone marrow cells obtained from 264 patients. When the cytogenetic categorization of the IPSS (International Prognostic Scoring System) for MDS was applied, significantly higher numbers of MDS-Eos and MDS-Bas patients had chromosomal abnormalities carrying intermediate or poor prognosis, compared with the MDS ؊/؊ patients. Specific chromosomal abnormalities and complex karyotypes were associated with MDS-Eos and/or MDS-Bas. In accordance with these results, the overall survival rate was significantly lower, and the evolution to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) occurred more frequently in the MDS-Eos and MDSBas than in the MDS ؊/؊ patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that bone marrow basophilia was an independent risk factor for evolution to AML. Our study indicates that bone marrow eosinophilia and basophilia in patients with MDS predict a poorer prognosis. (Blood. 2003;

A 72-year-old man with a 10-year history of coronary heart disease started evolocumab treatment once a month after developing excess myalgia due to therapy with a 3-hydroxy-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitor. No side effects such as myalgia symptoms had been reported during the first 14 months of evolocumab treatment; however, he suddenly presented with acute severe thrombocytopenia following the 14th treatment. His platelet count continued to decrease to a nadir of 1,000/μL. His platelet-associated immunoglobulin G level had elevated to 790 ng/107 cells. He started receiving a combination of steroid therapy, high-dose immunoglobulin therapy, and platelet transfusions, but the first-line therapy was ineffective. He was subsequently treated with a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, and his platelet count recovered to 250,000/μL.

No abstract