Which state does lose less quantum information between GHZ and W states when they are prepared for two-party quantum teleportation through noisy channel? We address this issue by solving analytically a master equation in the Lindbald form with introducing the noisy channels which makes the quantum channels to be mixed states. It is found that the answer of the question is dependent on the type of the noisy channel. If, for example, the noisy channel is (L 2,x , L 3,x , L 4,x )-type where L ′ s denote the Lindbald operators, GHZ state is always more robust than W state, i.e. GHZ state preserves more quantum information. In, however, (L 2,y , L 3,y , L 4,y )-type channel the situation becomes completely reversed. In (L 2,z , L 3,z , L 4,z )-type channel W state is more robust than GHZ state when the noisy parameter (κ) is comparatively small while GHZ state becomes more robust when κ is large. In isotropic noisy channel we found that both states preserve equal amount of quantum information. A relation between the average fidelity and entanglement for the mixed state quantum channels are discussed.
We study a generalized amplitude damping channel when environment is initially in the singlequbit mixed state. Representing the affine transformation of the generalized amplitude damping by a three-dimensional volume, we plot explicitly the volume occupied by the channels simulatable by a single-qubit mixed-state environment. As expected, this volume is embedded in the total volume by the channels which is simulated by two-qubit enviroment. The volume ratio is approximately 0.08 which is much smaller than 3/8, the volume ratio for generalized depolarizing channels.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.