Background:Free-style flaps allow surgeons to overcome anatomical variations and raise perforator flaps wherever a pulsatile signal can be detected. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the risk factors for complications and indications for free-style flaps in soft-tissue defect reconstructions.Methods:This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1991 to January 2017 for original articles describing free-style flaps in soft-tissue defect reconstruction.Results:A total of 17 articles met the inclusion criteria, representing 453 free-style flaps. The percentage of free-style flaps conducted after primary oncologic resection was 54.4% (246/453). Free-style flaps were mostly used in the head and neck region (35.5%), and most of them were designed as pedicled perforator flaps (96.7%). Complete flap survival was accomplished in 91.8% of the free-style flaps. Complications were found in 13.5% of cases, and 2 risk factors were identified: extremity defects (risk ratio, 2.39; P = 0.006) and single perforator flaps (risk ratio, 4.93; P = 0.002). No significant differences were found among the criteria including patients aged greater than 60 years, female gender, chronic etiology, flap size over 100 cm2, flap rotation, or perforator skeletonization.Conclusions:Free-style flaps are both reliable and advanced forms of perforator flaps for use in soft-tissue defect reconstructions. Defects located on the extremities and flaps with single perforators are risk factors for flap failure and complications.

Introduction:The Pacman flap is a novel modality for repairing round soft-tissue defects after tumor resection. This modality provides a robust blood supply without microsurgical tissue rearrangement. This article reviews the authors’ experience with Pacman flap for reconstruction of round soft-tissue defects. The safety and effectiveness of the Pacman flap are investigated.Methods:Here, we describe a method for oncologic reconstruction of round soft-tissue defects with a Pacman flap after tumor resection. Fourteen consecutive patients (6 males and 8 females, median age of 60 years, range, 18–87 years) who received Pacman flaps for oncologic reconstruction during the period from April 2015 to April 2017 were included in the present study.Results:In total, 15 Pacman flaps (including 1 bilateral Pacman flap) were created to provide coverage after resection of a tumor from the face (n = 11), chest (n = 1), or extremities (n = 2). One patient had twice previously undergone tumor resection. Median defect size was 25.5 × 25 mm (range, 9 × 9–100 × 90 mm). Median flap size was 35 × 27 mm (range, 12 × 10–120 × 110 mm). Median duration of follow-up was 10 months (range, 6–22 months). No local or distal tumor was observed during the follow-up period. All flaps survived without partial or complete necrosis, infection, or other complications. All patients were satisfied with their aesthetic outcomes. A hematoma formed in 1 patient and was successfully treated with debridement.Conclusions:The Pacman flap enables the surgeon to achieve tension-free round defect closure after tumor resection, with good functional and aesthetic outcomes. This modality is a reliable and effective reconstructive surgical technique for oncologic reconstruction of round soft-tissue defects.

We are the first to describe gluteal morphology in young Chinese woman using gluteal anthropometrics. The findings of the study may provide a guideline for plastic surgeons who perform gluteal augmentation in Asian patients.