International audienceThis paper describes an efficient methodology for the identification of soil parameters using the combination of the finite element method and the in situ pressuremeter test (PMT). The objective of the procedure applied here is to identify the parameters of generalized Prager model associated with the Drucker and Prager failure criterion from a pressuremeter expansion curve. The approach consists of minimizing the function representing the difference between the experimental curve and the curve obtained by integrating the model along the loading path in the in situ testing. First, both analytical expressions governing the problem of cavity expansion and those related to the finite element modeling are given in detail. Then, a Fortran computer program called "Press-Sim" along with the solution strategy are described and clearly explained. The influence of some model parameters as well as the probe geometry on the computed pressuremeter curves is examined. The paper finishes by presenting some identification examples drawn from real experimental tests for which the targeted parameters are compared with those of other experimental procedures. Results of comparison show a very good agreement

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The soil parameters identification procedure is usually a trade-off between sophisticated soil model behaviour and the large number of parameters to identify. Such procedure that can accomplish both of these objectives is highly desirable, but also difficult. This paper presents a methodology for identifying soil parameters that takes into account different constitutive equations. For identifying the generalized Prager model parameters, associated to the Drucker and Prager failure criterion, using an in-situ pressuremeter curve, we have proposed a procedure that is based on an approach of inverse analysis. This approach involves the minimizing the function representing the area between the experimental curve and the simulated curve, obtained by fit in the model along the in-situ loading path. A comparative study between two optimization processes is proposed. The first is based on the technique of the simplex by Nelder and Mead, while the second is based on the decomposition of the pressuremeter curve in three distinct areas. After a brief description of an existing computer program called Press-Sim, which has been written in Fortran for analyzing a cavity expansion using the finite element method, a short explanation is given about the two optimization procedures considered in this article. Then, for a chosen site where soil strength parameters are measured, the comparative study has been performed for both methods at four different depths. For the determination of the angle of friction, the two procedures yield very close values and are in a good agreement with that given by the triaxial test, while for the cohesion, they both diverge from each other on both sides of the value measured by the trial test.