Rezafungin is a novel echinocandin with exceptional stability and solubility and a uniquely long half-life allowing for front-loaded drug exposure with once-weekly dosing. Rezafungin has been shown comparable to other echinocandins, with activity against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. including subsets of echinocandin-resistant Candida auris and azole-resistant Aspergillus isolates. Available clinical data show robust safety and promising efficacy. Phase III trials will provide data on efficacy of rezafungin for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis and for the prevention of invasive fungal disease in blood and bone marrow transplant recipients. Rezafungin is a promising new candidate in the antifungal arsenal that opens up clinical possibilities based on its impressive half-life, such as early hospital discharge for stable patients and use as prophylaxis in immunocompromised patients.

Background: Penicillin allergy is commonly reported and has clinical and financial consequences for patients and hospitals. A penicillin evaluation program can safely delabel patients and optimize antibiotic therapy. Pharmacists who perform this task have focused on a detailed interview or penicillin skin testing (PST). Antibiotic graded challenge after PST requires more resources and is more costly than going directly to a two-step challenge. Objective: To determine whether a pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy evaluation and a testing protocol that primarily uses direct oral challenges can safely delabel patients. Methods: Adult patients (ages >18 years) with a penicillin allergy in their electronic medical record (EMR) who were admitted between September 2019 and June 2020 were eligible. Although all patients with penicillin allergy were eligible, priority was given to patients who required antibiotics. Patients were interviewed, and, if indicated, based on an institutional protocol, were tested by using PST and/or two-step oral challenge. If the patient passed the challenge, then the penicillin allergy label was removed in the EMR and the patient counseled. Demographic information, allergy questionnaire results, testing results, and changes in antimicrobial therapy were collected. Results: Fifty patients were evaluated from September 2019 to June 2020. Ninety-six percent of the patients were delabeled, and antibiotic therapy changed for 54%. Twenty patients were delabeled with an interview alone, and 30 patients underwent oral two-step challenge. Only one patient required PST. Conclusion: A pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy evaluation program focused on direct oral graded challenges and bypassing PST can effectively delabel admitted patients. However, more safety data are needed before implementation of similar programs to optimize antibiotic treatment.

Background Immunocompromised populations including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a high likelihood of need for antibiotic therapy for treatment of infection as well as for prophylaxis. Antibiotic allergy is commonly reported and often leads to the use of alternative, second‐line antibiotics, which have been associated with poor outcomes, increased adverse effects, and higher cost. Formal allergy assessment and allergy testing can serve as an important antimicrobial stewardship tool in optimizing antibiotic regimens for this patient population. Methods A PubMed search with relevant keywords was performed. Review of relevant professional society guidelines was also performed. Results Documented penicillin and sulfonamide allergies are common impediments to the treatment and prophylaxis of immunocompromised populations, but are rarely formally evaluated in practice; however, there is evidence that most patients with documented allergy to these antibiotics can, in fact, tolerate penicillins and sulfonamide antibiotics. Implementation of an antibiotic allergy evaluation and testing program has been shown to increase the use of first‐line antibiotics and can be cost saving. Conclusion Antibiotic allergies have significant clinical consequences, especially in immunocompromised populations. Evaluation of these allergies to prevent the avoidance of first‐line antibiotics should be a standard part of the workflow for these patients, prior to transplant. Programs can be tailored to the available personnel and resources of the organization.