Objective: To compare changes in pharyngeal airway volume and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) between patients undergoing rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and a matched control group and to identify markers for predicting airway changes using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Pre- and posttreatment CBCT scans were selected of children who had RME (14 girls and 12 boys; mean age, 12.4 years) along with scans of a control group (matched for chronological age, skeletal age, gender, mandibular inclination) who underwent orthodontic treatment for minor malocclusions without RME. Changes in airway volume and MCA were evaluated using a standardized, previously validated method and analyzed by a mixed-effects linear regression model. Results: Upper airway volume and MCA increased significantly over time for both the RME and matched control groups (P < .01 and P = .05, respectively). Although the RME group showed a greater increase when compared with the matched controls, this difference was not statistically significant. A reduced skeletal age before treatment was a significant marker for a positive effect on the upper airway volume and MCA changes (P < .01). Conclusions: Tooth-borne RME is not associated with a significant change in upper airway volume or MCA in children when compared with controls. The younger the skeletal age before treatment, the more positive the effect on the upper airway changes. The results may prove valuable, especially in RME of young children.

Objectives: Recently, studies have performed three-dimensional analyses of upper airways in children. However, there was a lack of airway delineation according to anatomical boundaries and/or easily mobile soft-tissue landmarks were used. The aim of the present study was to define new upper airway margins in children on CBCT according to anatomical bony landmarks and to validate the method. Methods: 25 scans were randomly selected from a larger database containing CBCT scans of children prior to orthodontic treatment (14 girls and 11 boys; mean age, 10.9 ± 2.5 years). Scans were evaluated by two observers. Specific head positioning and virtual orientation protocols were adopted and greyscale thresholding was established for each patient. Volume and minimum cross-sectional area of the oropharynx were calculated. Intra-and interobserver reliability were assessed by reassessment of the CBCTs 2 weeks later. Results: The new airway margins were defined superiorly by a line passing through the palatal plane (anterior nasal spine to posterior nasal spine) extending to the posterior wall of the pharynx, inferiorly by a line passing from the anterosuperior edge of C4 to menton, anteriorly by a line passing from the soft palate to menton, posteriorly and laterally by the respective pharyngeal walls. Method error for airway volume and minimal cross-sectional area was #2.00%, and intra-and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.99 to 1.00. Conclusions: The proposed protocol utilizes easily identifiable bony landmarks to delineate the upper airway on cone beam scans of children and was found to be reliable and reproducible.

No abstract

No abstract