Abstract-Social network theory is becoming more and more significant in social science, and the centrality measure is underlying this burgeoning theory. In perspective of social network, individuals, organizations, companies etc. are like nodes in the network, and centrality is used to measure these nodes' power, activity, communication convenience and so on. Meanwhile, degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality are the popular detailed measurements. This paper presents these 3 centrality in-depth, from principle to algorithm, and prospect good in the future use.

Interest has increased recently in correlations across brain regions in the resting-state fMRI blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response, but little is known about the functional significance of these correlations. Here we directly test the behavioral relevance of the resting-state correlation between two face-selective regions in human brain, the occipital face area (OFA) and the fusiform face area (FFA). We found that the magnitude of the resting-state correlation, henceforth called functional connectivity (FC), between OFA and FFA correlates with an individual's performance on a number of face-processing tasks, not non-face tasks. Further, we found that the behavioral significance of the OFA/FFA FC is independent of the functional activation and the anatomical size of either the OFA or FFA, suggesting that face processing depends not only on the functionality of individual face-selective regions, but also on the synchronized spontaneous neural activity between them. Together, these findings provide strong evidence that the functional correlations in the BOLD response observed at rest reveal functionally significant properties of cortical processing. IntroductionRecently a number of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have investigated neural activity in the human brain during periods of rest (when no stimuli are presented and no tasks are performed), and found that the spontaneous blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fluctuations are not random, but correlated across cortical regions with similar functional properties [for review, see Fox and Raichle (2007) and Greicius (2008)]. Further, these functional correlations are thought to reflect functional relationships mediated by anatomical connections (e.g., Vincent et al., 2007;Greicius et al., 2009;Honey et al., 2009). However, despite the abundance of work finding such correlations across cortical regions, little is known about the functional significance of these correlations: is synchronized spontaneous neural activity across cortical regions relevant for behavior, or is it merely epiphenomenal? Here we addressed this question by directly testing the behavioral significance of the resting-state correlations between two face-selective regions in the occipitotemporal cortex that are primarily involved in recognition of individual identity (Haxby et al., 2000;Calder and Young, 2005;Ishai, 2008)-the occipital face area (OFA) (Gauthier et al., 2000) and the fusiform face area (FFA) (Kanwisher et al., 1997)-found to be functionally correlated using resting-state fMRI (Nir et al., 2006;Zhang et al., 2009).First, we calculated the correlation in spontaneous BOLD fluctuations between OFA and FFA during the resting state in participants, and then behaviorally tested the same participants outside the scanner on a number of face and non-face tasks. If the correlation in spontaneous BOLD fluctuations between OFA and FFA, henceforth referred to as functional connectivity (FC), is behaviorally relevant, then we predict that the magnitude of the OF...

Processing of emotional stimuli can either hinder or facilitate ongoing working memory (WM); however, the neural basis of these effects remains largely unknown. Here we examined the neural mechanisms of these paradoxical effects by implementing a novel emotional WM task in an fMRI study. Twenty-five young healthy participants performed an N-back task with fearful and neutral faces as stimuli. Participants made more errors when performing 0-back task with fearful versus neutral faces, whereas they made fewer errors when performing 2-back task with fearful versus neutral faces. These emotional impairment and enhancement on behavioral performance paralleled significant interactions in distributed regions in the salience network including anterior insula (AI) and dorsal cingulate cortex (dACC), as well as in emotion perception network including amygdala and temporal-occipital association cortex (TOC). The dorsal AI (dAI) and dACC were more activated when comparing fearful with neutral faces in 0-back task. Contrarily, dAI showed reduced activation, while TOC and amygdala showed stronger responses to fearful as compared to neutral faces in the 2-back task. These findings provide direct neural evidence to the emerging dual competition model suggesting that the salience network plays a critical role in mediating interaction between emotion perception and executive control when facing ever-changing behavioral demands.