Rationale:Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is a relatively rare malignancy of the exocrine pancreas. BRCA2, a cancer susceptibility gene, has been widely studied in breast and ovarian carcinomas as mutation carriers for this gene are at a high risk for cancer development. Olaparib, an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer with any BRCA 1/2 mutations. Herein, we report the first case of a germline BRCA2-mutated unresectable advanced PACC patient who responded well to olaparib treatment.Patient concerns:A 59-year-old male with a family history of cancer presented with a persistent epigastric dull pain for 3 months.Diagnosis:The patient was diagnosed with advanced PACC based on computed tomography (CT) scan, laparotomy, and pathology.Interventions:Exploratory laparotomy, intratumoral brachytherapy by radioiodine-125 seeds, modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, and targeted therapy with olaparib were administered.Outcomes:The patient responded well to olaparib until the occurrence of severe adverse drug reactions, he died as a result of multiple organ failure with an overall survival period of 12 months.Lessons:As a PARP inhibitor, olaparib has remarkable curative effect not only on breast and ovarian cancers, but also on other malignancies with BRCA mutations. Patients with advanced cancer could benefit from active targeted therapy with improvement in overall survival and quality of life.

BackgroundLiver metastases (LMs) are common in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients. Currently, the benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of PNET patients with liver metastases is still controversial in several guidelines.MethodsData were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate this issue. The main index of interest in our study was overall survival time.ResultsInformation on 536 PNET patients with liver metastases from the SEER database was identified. A total of 214 patients (PTR group) received primary tumor resection, and more than half of them (132 patients) had synchronous LM resection. The other 322 PNET patients (non-PTR group) with liver metastases did not receive primary tumor resection. A significant survival benefit was gained from PTR when compared with non-PTR patients, both in OS (72.93 ± 2.7 vs. 36.80 ± 2.22 months) and 3- or 5-year survival rates (75.1% vs. 28.9% and 67.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively). No difference was found between PTR alone and PTR with synchronous LM resection. From univariate and multivariate analyses, younger age (<65 years) and good or moderate tumor differentiation may be more important when considering primary tumor resection. However, we found that all grades of tumor differentiation could result in a better overall survival time after primary tumor resection.ConclusionOur study suggested that primary tumor resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine patients with liver metastases could result in a longer survival time. Primary tumor resection with synchronous liver metastasis resection was not related to a better survival benefit. This treatment strategy may routinely be taken into consideration in these patients.

BackgroundSurgery is an effective choice for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis (CP). However, there is no clear consensus regarding the best choice among the surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment outcomes to provide high-quality evidences regarding which is the best surgery for CP.MethodsA systematic search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), SCIE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CDSR databases were performed to identify studies comparing surgeries for CP from the beginning of the databases to May 2020. Pain relief and mortality were the primary outcomes of interest.ResultsTen studies including a total of 680 patients were identified for inclusion. PPPD had a better postoperative short-term pain relief and quality of life (QOL), but a worse pancreatic exocrine function deficiency and high morbidity. Berne had a significant postoperative long-term pain relief and mortality with a lower risk of pancreatic exocrine function deficiency.ConclusionThe main surgical procedures including the PPPD, Beger procedure, Frey modification and Berne modification can efficaciously treat CP. The Berne modification may be first choice with better efficacy and less complications in pancreatic function, but the impact of postoperative QOL cannot be ignored. Furthermore, when the CP patients have a mass in the pancreatic head which cannot be distinguished from pancreatic cancer, the only legitimate choice should be PPPD or classical pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Objectives Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling pathway is one of the core pathways in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Prognostic value of TGF-β pathway genes as a functionally related group in PDAC is rarely studied. Methods Seventy-two PDAC patients who underwent surgery between November 30, 2015, and September 13, 2017, in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, were identified and included in this study. Whole-exome sequencing or targeted next-generation sequencing was performed with tumor tissue. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results Genetic alterations were detected in 71 patients (98.6%). Although 1 patient (1.4%) had one genetic alteration, 33 patients (45.8%) had 2 to 4 alterations and 37 patients (51.4%) had 5 or more alterations. Twenty-five patients with TGF-β pathway alteration were identified as TGF-βm+ group. Other 47 patients were TGF-βm− group. Mutation of TGF-β pathway was independently associated with inferior survival (hazard ratio, 2.22, 95% confidence interval, 1.05–4.70, P = 0.04), especially in patients accepting radical surgery (hazard ratio, 3.25, 95% confidence interval, 1.01–10.49, P = 0.04). Conclusions Inferior prognosis was observed in PDACs with mutations of TGF-β pathway. Genomic information could help screen out patients at risk after surgery, and adjuvant therapy might benefit this subgroup of PDACs.

Background: The recurrence and liver metastasis rates are still high in pancreatic head cancer with curative surgical resection. A no-touch isolation principle in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may improve this situation, however, the exact advantages and efficacy of these principles have not been confirmed. Materials and methods: Among 370 patients who underwent PD, three centers were selected and classified into two groups: the no-touch PD group (n = 70) and the conventional PD group (n = 300). Propensity score matching was used to control for selection bias at a ratio of 1:1. The confounding variables were age, sex, body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor size and tumor differentiation. Results: Patients in the no-touch PD group had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those in the conventional PD group (OS: 17 vs. 13 months, p = 0.0035, DFS: 15 vs. 12 months, p = 0.087), with lower 1- and 2-year disease-related mortality rates (1-year: 32.9% vs. 47%, p = 0.032; 2-year: 42.5% vs. 82% p = 0.000) and recurrence and liver metastasis rates (1-year: 30.0% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.041; 2-year: 34.3% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.030). Compared with the matched conventional PD group, the no-touch PD group also had a better OS (17 vs. 12 months, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Our study showed the no-touch isolation principle may be a better choice to improve long-term survival for pancreatic cancer patients.