Background A minimally invasive procedure for symptomatic pelvic bone metastasis is a feasible option for advanced cancer patients, and bone cement injection plays an essential role. Pulmonary embolism caused by thrombus, fat, or tumor emboli is a major complication related to bone cement injection, and increasing intraosseous pressure is a predisposing factor. This study aimed to quantify the degree of pressure change in the pelvic bone during percutaneous bone cement injection and investigate whether there is a significant decrease in intraosseous pressure when a decompressive route is additionally established. Methods Bone cement injection into the acetabulum of swine pelvises by simulating the actual surgical procedure in terms of the injection method, bone cement, and surgical instruments was performed while recording the intraosseous pressure. Twenty swine pelvises were used and grouped into a decompression group and a non-decompression group. Bone cement injection and pressure measurement were conducted in the same way in both groups, but an additional decompressive route was established for each pelvis in the decompression group. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Results The mean amount of injected bone cement was 19.8 mL and 20.3 mL and the mean speed of bone cement injection was 0.14 mL/sec and 0.12 mL/sec in the decompression group and the non-decompression group, respectively. The mean peak intraosseous pressures was 10.5 kPa with decompression and 37.8 kPa without decompression, and the difference was statistically significant ( p < 0.01). Conclusions Intraosseous pressure during bone cement injection into swine pelvises was similar to that during vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. When the additional decompression route was established, the intraosseous pressure decreased to one third the level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.