BackgroundEarly detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality among newborns. We investigate the feasibility of implementing a community-based newborn CCHD screening program in Taipei.MethodsTwelve birthing facilities in Taipei participated in a trial screening program between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2014. Newborns underwent pulse oximetry at 24–36 h old, with probes attached to the right hand and one lower limb. Any screening saturation ≥95% in either extremity, with an absolute difference of ≤3% between the right hand and foot, was accepted as a screening pass. A screening result was considered as a fail if the oxygen saturation was <95% at either probe site, on 3 separate occasions, each separated by 30 min or the first result was <95% at either probe site, and any subsequent oxygen saturation measurement was <90%. Public health nurses would follow up all missed or refused cases.ResultsOf the 6,387 live births, 6,296 newborns (coverage rate: 6,296/6,387 = 98.6%) underwent appropriate pulse oximetry screening. Sixteen newborns (0.25%) were reported to have a failed screening result. Five of these screen positive newborns were confirmed with CCHD; two of them were diagnosed solely attributed to the failed screening results. The false-positive rate was 0.18%. Implementing a 6-month screening program for CCHD produced good case detection rate, while using efficient screening and referral systems.ConclusionThis program was successful in integrating screening, referral and public health tracking systems. The protocol outlined in this report could provide a community-based model for worldwide implementation.

OBJECTIVES: An extended newborn critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening program using oximetry has been implemented in Taipei, Taiwan since April 2014. This study was conducted to investigate the test accuracy and efficiency of this screening protocol. METHODS: This study analyzed data from 30 birthing facilities representing 87.9% of live births in Taipei. Positive screening was defined as oxygen saturation &lt;95% in either extremity or a preductal-postductal oxygen saturation difference of &gt;3%. This study cohort was used to retrospectively estimate outcomes on the basis of different CCHD screening protocols. RESULTS: During the study period, 93 058 of 94 239 (98.7%) infants who had no prenatal suspicion were screened. The referral rate was 0.17% (156/93 058), and up to 90% of test-positive infants were referred within 48 hours of life. Forty-two CCHD cases without prenatal suspicion were detected and 97.6% were diagnosed within 72 hours of life. Of the screened newborns, 4 CCHD cases passed the screening. The false positive and false negative rates were 0.12% and 0.04%, respectively. In addition, applying our database to Spanish and updated American Academy of Pediatrics screening strategies led to more CCHD case detection. CONCLUSIONS: The Taipei protocol provided an efficient and effective screening referral system in a community setting. For optimal efficiency, we advocated the updated American Academy of Pediatrics algorithm/Spanish recommendation with a modification of immediate referral if oxygen saturation ≤90% in either extremity. The updated protocol would be practicable for nationwide screening in Taiwan and could also be applied to other regions with similar medical care systems.