Motor imagery (MI) requires subjects to visualize the requested motor behaviors, which involves a large-scale network that spans multiple brain areas. The corresponding cortical activity reflected on the scalp is characterized by event-related desynchronization (ERD) and then by event-related synchronization (ERS). However, the network mechanisms that account for the dynamic information processing of MI during the ERD and ERS periods remain unknown. Here, we combined ERD/ERS analysis with the dynamic networks in different MI stages (i.e. motor preparation, ERD and ERS) to probe the dynamic processing of MI information. Our results show that specific dynamic network structures correspond to the ERD/ERS evolution patterns. Specifically, ERD mainly shows the contralateral networks, while ERS has the symmetric networks. Moreover, different dynamic network patterns are also revealed between the two types of MIs, in which the left-hand MIs exhibit a relatively less sustained contralateral network, which may be the network mechanism that accounts for the bilateral ERD/ERS observed for the left-hand MIs. Similar to the network topologies, the three MI stages also appear to be characterized by different network properties. The above findings all demonstrate that different MI stages that involve specific brain networks for dynamically processing the MI information.
This study used large-scale time-varying network analysis to reveal the diverse network patterns during the different decision stages and found that the responses of rejection and acceptance involved different network structures. When participants accept unfair offers, the brain recruits a more bottom-up mechanism with a much stronger information flow from the visual cortex (O2) to the frontal area, but when they reject unfair offers, it displayed a more top-down flow derived from the frontal cortex (Fz) to the parietal and occipital cortices. Furthermore, we performed 2 additional studies to validate the above network models: one was to identify the 2 responses based on the out-degree information of network hub nodes, which results in 70% accuracy, and the other utilized theta burst stimulation (TBS) of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to modulate the frontal area before the decision-making tasks. We found that the intermittent TBS group demonstrated lower acceptance rates and that the continuous TBS group showed higher acceptance rates compared with the sham group. Similar effects were not observed after TBS of a control site. These results suggest that the revealed decision-making network model can serve as a potential intervention model to alter decision responses.
The interaction between dorsal and ventral attention networks (VANs) is mediated by the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), which is functionally connected to both networks. However, the direct role of the MFG in selective and sustained attention remains controversial. In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to probe the connectivity dynamic changes of MFG-associated regions during different attention modes. The participants underwent visual, selective, and sustained attention tasks to observe TMS-induced network changes. Twenty healthy participants received single-pulse TMS over the left or right MFG during tasks, while synchronous EEG data was acquired. Behavioral results were recorded and time-varying brain network analyses were performed. We found that the MFG is involved in attention processing and that sustained attention was preferentially controlled by the right MFG. Moreover, compared with the right hemisphere, the left hemisphere was associated with selective attention tasks. Visual and selective attention tasks induced MFG-related changes in network nodes were within the left hemisphere; however, sustained attention induced changes in network nodes were in the bilateral posterior MFG. Our findings indicated that the MFG plays a crucial role in regulating attention networks. In particular, TMS-induced MFG alterations influenced key nodes of the time-varying brain network, leading to the reorganization of brain network modules.
Objective. Despite increasing evidence revealing the relationship between task-related brain activity and decision-making, the association between resting-state functional connectivity and decision-making remains unknown. Approach. In this study, we investigated the potential relationship between the network revealed in the resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) and decision responses and further predicted individuals’ acceptance rates during the ultimatum game (UG) based on the functional connectivity revealed in the resting-state EEG. Main results. The results of this study demonstrated a significant relationship between the resting-state frontal-occipital connectivity and the UG acceptance rate in the alpha band. Increased acceptance rates were accompanied by a larger clustering coefficient and global and local efficiency as well as a shorter characteristic path length. Compared to the low-acceptance group, the high-acceptance group exhibited stronger frontal-occipital linkages. Finally, a multiple linear regression model based on the resting-state EEG network properties was adopted to predict the acceptance rates when subjects made their decision in the UG task. Significance. Together, the findings of this study may deepen our knowledge of decision-making and provide a potential physiological biomarker to predict the decision-making responses of subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.