Fe/N/C is a promising non-Pt electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), but its catalytic activity is considerably inferior to that of Pt in acidic medium, the environment of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). An improved Fe/N/C catalyst (denoted as Fe/N/C-SCN) derived from Fe(SCN)3, poly-m-phenylenediamine, and carbon black is presented. The advantage of using Fe(SCN)3 as iron source is that the obtained catalyst has a high level of S doping and high surface area, and thus exhibits excellent ORR activity (23 A g(-1) at 0.80 V) in 0.1 M H2SO4 solution. When the Fe/N/C-SCN was applied in a PEMFC as cathode catalyst, the maximal power density could exceed 1 W cm(-2).
While altered expression of microRNAs (miRs) in tumors has been well documented, it remains unclear how the miR transcriptome intersects neoplastic progression. By profiling the miR transcriptome we identified miR expression signatures associated with steps in tumorigenesis and the acquisition of hallmark capabilities in a prototypical mouse model of cancer. Metastases and a rare subset of primary tumors shared a distinct miR signature, implicating a discrete lineage for metastatic tumors. The miR-200 family is strongly down-regulated in metastases and met-like primary tumors, thereby relieving repression of the mesenchymal transcription factor Zeb1, which in turn suppresses E-cadherin. Treatment with a clinically approved angiogenesis inhibitor normalized angiogenic signature miRs in primary tumors, while altering expression of metastatic signature miRs similarly to liver metastases, suggesting their involvement in adaptive resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy via enhanced metastasis. Many of the miR changes associated with specific stages and hallmark capabilities in the mouse model are similarly altered in human tumors, including cognate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, implying a generality.[Keywords: MicroRNA; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET); cancer; transgenic mouse; mouse model of human cancer; miR-200] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
kinetics of ORR is around five orders of magnitude slower than that of HOR, thereby requiring a much higher Pt loading in the cathode along with more active and durable ORR electrocatalysts than pure Pt catalysts. [1] This requirement presents challenges for the development of advanced cathode catalysts with lower cost, higher activity and higher durability than Pt. Meanwhile, traditional alkaline fuel cells (AFCs) working on concentrated 30−45% KOH electrolytes gained little attention for decades mainly due to their high sensitivity to atmospheric CO 2 . [2,3] The OH − ions in the electrolyte react with CO 2 and form K 2 CO 3 , which can precipitate out as solid crystals, blocking pores in the electrode and gas diffusion layer. In addition, the consumption of OH − reduces the conductivity of the electrolyte. This issue is addressed by replacing KOH solution with a solid anion exchange membrane (AEM) without mobile cations. An AMFC offers several important advantages over PEMFCs, including: 1) low dissolution rates of catalysts, allowing the use of less expensive Pt-free electrocatalysts; 2) wide selections of materials and components that are stable at high pH; and 3) inexpensive solid electrolytes that do not need fluorinated ionomers. Despite their promise, AMFCs are still in the early development stage and have not been systematically investigated due to the lack of highly conductive and durable AEMs. The recent development of highly conductive
The rapid progress of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and alkaline exchange membrane fuel cells (AMFCs) has boosted the hydrogen economy concept via diverse energy applications in the past decades. For a holistic understanding of the development status of PEMFCs and AMFCs, recent advancements in electrocatalyst design and catalyst layer optimization, along with cell performance in terms of activity and durability in PEMFCs and AMFCs, are summarized here. The activity, stability, and fuel cell performance of different types of electrocatalysts for both oxygen reduction reaction and hydrogen oxidation reaction are discussed and compared. Research directions on the further development of active, stable, and low-cost electrocatalysts to meet the ultimate commercialization of PEMFCs and AMFCs are also discussed.The ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006292.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.