Objective To verify glomerular PLA2R antigen and serum PLA2R antibody expression in membranous nephropathy as well as to explore glomerular PLA2R efficacy in evaluating the prognosis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) in the background of different serum anti-PLA2R levels. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 155 patients who were diagnosed with IMN by kidney biopsy. Patients were divided into six groups according to their serum PLA2R antibody or glomerular PLA2R antigen positiveness and the level of serum anti-PLA2R titer. Both clinical features and pathological characteristics were recorded, and the remission time was compared among groups. Correlation between clinical figures and the anti-PLA2R titer or semi-quantity of glomerular PLA2R antigen was detected. Results A positive correlation between time to partial remission and serum anti-PLA2R titer was found. Among patients with serum anti-PLA2R titer <150 RU/ml, there were shorter remission time in negative glomerular PLA2R antigen group compared with positive glomerular PLA2R antigen, and a positive correlation between time to complete remission and semi-quantity of glomerular PLA2R antigen was found. Conclusion Both glomerular PLA2R antigen and serum anti-PLA2R play a role in disease presentation and prognosis in primary membranous nephropathy. Glomerular PLA2R antigen has a major role on disease prognosis when serum anti-PLA2R titer is less than 150RU/ml, while serum anti-PLA2R has predominant role in IMN prognosis when serum anti-PLA2R titer is above 150RU/ml.

Aim To compare clinical and pathological characteristics as well as prognosis between diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) so as to explore potential diagnostic criteria of DN and provide some guidance for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with kidney involvement. Methods T2DM patients with renal impairment who underwent kidney biopsy were included in this study, who were classified into 3 groups (DN, NDRD, DN with NDRD) based on their renal pathological diagnosis. Baseline clinical characteristics as well as follow-up data were collected and analyzed among 3 groups. Logistic regression was performed to determine the best predictors for DN diagnosis. Additional 34 MN patients without diabetes were enrolled by propensity score matching method to compare serum PLA2R antibody titer and kidney outcomes between diabetic MN patients and MN alone. Results Among 365 patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent kidney biopsy, 179 (49.0%) patients were diagnosed with NDRD alone and 37 (10.1%) patients with NDRD combined DN. Risk factors for DN development in T2DM patients were longer time since diabetes diagnosis, higher level of serum creatinine, absence of hematuria and presence of diabetic retinopathy by multivariate analysis. Lower rate of proteinuria remission and higher risk of renal progression were observed in DN group compared with NDRD group. Membranous nephropathy was the most common NDRD in diabetic patients. There was no difference in serum PLA2R antibody positiveness or titer between MN patients with or without T2DM. There was lower remission rate but similar renal progression in diabetic MN when age, gender, baseline eGFR, albuminuria and IFTA score were adjusted. Conclusions Non-diabetic renal disease is not uncommon in T2DM patients with renal impairment, which has better prognosis with proper treatment. Coexisting diabetic status does not exert negative impact on renal progression in MN patients, and immunosuppressive agents should be administered when necessary.