BackgroundCanal switch-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (CS-BPPV) refers to the phenomenon in which otolith particles move from one canal to another (on the ipsilateral side) during or after canalith repositioning procedure (CRP). However, the clinical characteristics of CS-BPPV and the underlying pathological mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the incidence of canal switch (CS) for the different semicircular canals in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), examined nystagmus characteristics, and explored the underlying mechanisms.MethodsClinical data for 1,099 patients with single-canal BPPV were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The incidences of CS in the different types of BPPV were analyzed. Patients were divided into CS-BPPV and non-CS (NCS)-BPPV groups according to whether they exhibited CS after CRP. The baseline characteristics and nystagmus characteristics of patients were compared between the two groups.ResultsPatients with BPPV who developed or did not develop CS accounted for 4.6% (51/1,099) and 95.4% (1,048/1,099), respectively, of the patients included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of the canals involved, hypertension, or diabetes. CS was observed in 3.7% (25/677) of patients with PC-BPPV, including conversion between posterior canal (PC) and horizontal canal (HC) (1.6%, 11/677), and between PC and anterior canal (AC) (2.1%, 14/677). CS was observed in 5.2% (17/327) of patients with HC-BPPV, including from HC to PC (4.3%, 14/327), and from HC to AC (0.9%, 3/327). CS was found in 9.5% (9/95) of patients with AC-BPPV, including from AC to PC (8.4%, 8/95), and from AC to HC (1.1%, 1/95). The intensity of nystagmus was significantly greater in the CS-BPPV group compared with that in the NCS-BPPV group [24.00 (11–39) vs. 12.00 (7–24), P < 0.001]. Furthermore, the incidence of direction-reversing nystagmus was significantly higher in the CS-BPPV group than in the NCS-BPPV group [31.4% (16/51) vs. 4.3% (45/1,048), P < 0.001].ConclusionsCS in BPPV is uncommon. Patients with AC-BPPV are more likely to develop CS, followed by patients with HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV. The occurrence of CS-BPPV may be related to the anatomical structure of the semicircular canals. When the canals contain large/heavy accumulations of otolith particles, CS may be more common during re-examination after CRP.

ObjectivesTo investigate the localization diagnostic value of the ocular tilt reaction (OTR) plus head tilt subjective visual vertical (SVV) in patients with acute central vascular vertigo (ACVV).MethodsWe enrolled 40 patients with acute infarction, 20 with unilateral brainstem infarction (BI) and 20 with unilateral cerebellar infarction (CI). We also included 20 patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular disorders (UPVD) as the control group. The participants completed the OTR and SVV during head tilt (±45°) within 1 week of symptom onset.ResultsIn patients with ACVV, including that caused by lateral medullary infarction (100%, 2/2), partial pontine infarction (21%, 3/14), and cerebellum infarction (35%, 7/20), we observed ipsiversive OTR, similar to that seen in UPVD patients (80.0%, 16/20). Some of the patients with medial medullary infarction (50%, 1/2), partial pons infarction (42%, 6/14), midbrain infarction (100%, 2/2), and partial cerebellum infarction (30.0%, 6/20) showed contraversive OTR. The skew deviation (SD) of the BI group with ACVV was significantly greater than that of the UPVD group (6.60 ± 2.70° vs. 1.80 ± 1.30°, Z = −2.50, P = 0.012), such that the mean SD of the patients with a pons infarction was 9.50° and that of patients with medulla infarction was 5.00°. In ACVV patients with no cerebellar damage, the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve corresponding to the use of SD to predict brainstem damage was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.73–1.00), with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 80% when SD ≥ 3°. We found no statistical difference in SD between the UPVD and CI groups (1.33 ± 0.58° vs. 1.80 ± 1.30°, Z = −0.344, P = 0.73). Compared with the UPVD patients, the ACVV patients with a partial pons infarction (43%, 6/14, χ2 = 13.68, P = 0.002) or medulla infarction (25%, 1/4, χ2 = 4.94, P = 0.103) exhibited signs of the ipsiversive E-effect with the contraversive A-effect, while those with a partial medulla infarction (50%, 2/4), pons infarction (43%, 6/14), or cerebellar infarction (60%, 12/20) exhibited a pathological symmetrical increase in the E-effect.ConclusionsThe evaluation of OTR plus head tilt SVV (±45°) in vertigo patients is helpful for identifying and diagnosing ACVV, especially when SD is ≥ 3° or the E-effect is symmetrically increased.