Background The contemporary incidence of and reasons for early readmission after infective endocarditis ( IE ) are not well known. Therefore, we analyzed 30‐day readmission demographics after IE from the US Nationwide Readmission Database. Methods and Results We examined the 2010 to 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to identify index admissions for a primary diagnosis of IE with survival at discharge. Incidence, reasons, and independent predictors of 30‐day unplanned readmissions were analyzed. In total, 11 217 patients (24.8%) were nonelectively readmitted within 30 days among the 45 214 index admissions discharged after IE . The most common causes of readmission were IE (20.5%), sepsis (8.7%), complications of device/graft (8.1%), and congestive heart failure (7.6%). In‐hospital mortality and the valvular surgery rates during the readmissions were 8.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Discharge to home or self‐care, undergoing valvular surgery, aged ≥60 years, and having private insurance were independently associated with lower rates of 30‐day readmission. Length of stay of ≥10 days, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, chronic pulmonary disease, peripheral artery disease, and depression were associated with higher risk. The total hospital costs of readmission were $48.7 million per year (median, $11 267; interquartile range, $6021–$25 073), which accounted for 38.6% of the total episodes of care (index+readmission). Conclusions Almost 1 in 4 patients was readmitted within 30 days of admission for IE . The most common reasons were IE , other infectious causes, and cardiac causes. A multidisciplinary approach to determine the surgical indications and close monitoring are necessary to improve outcomes and reduce complications in in‐hospital and postdischarge settings.
Background: To perform self-care in patients with heart failure (HF), we developed and implemented a new HF point self-care system, which was characterized by 1) the way weight and HF symptoms were scored ("Heart Failure Points") and 2) the timing of consultations defined for both patients and health care providers. We examined the association between the induction of the new system and 1-year outcomes in patients hospitalized for HF. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 569 consecutive patients into our study who were admitted for HF treatment at our hospital: 275 patients between November 2011 and October 2013 (before the induction of the self-management system) and 294 patients between November 2015 and October 2017 (after the induction). We sought to compare the clinical outcomes between patients using the self-management system and those not using the system after propensity-score (PS) matching. The primary outcome measure was a composite of all-cause death or HF rehospitalization. Results: The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary outcome measure in the use group (n = 153) was significantly lower than that in the non-use group (n = 153) (24.5% vs. 34.9%, respectively; p = 0.031; hazard ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.40À0.96), mainly due to a reduction in HF hospitalization. Conclusions: The induction of the new self-care system was associated with better 1-year outcomes in patients hospitalized for HF. This system may help patients with HF to achieve more efficient self-care.
We assessed long-term outcomes after left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenting based on lesion types and stenting strategies. In the Assessing Optimal percutaneous coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery stenting registry, we evaluated 1,607 consecutive patients undergoing stent implantation for unprotected LMCA lesions (bifurcation lesions: n = 1318 and nonbifurcation lesions: n = 289). Among the bifurcation lesions, 1,281 lesions were treated with stenting across the bifurcation (bifurcation 1-stent strategy: n = 999 or bifurcation 2-stent strategy: n = 282). Among the nonbifurcation lesions, 219 lesions were treated with nonbifurcation stenting. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 (95% CI 4.5 to 4.8) years. The 5-year risk of bifurcation lesions relative to nonbifurcation lesions was neutral for target lesion revascularization (TLR) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.23, p = 0.34) and all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.71, p = 0.26). The risk of the bifurcation 1-stent strategy relative to nonbifurcation stenting in nonbifurcation lesions was also neutral for TLR (adjusted HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.90, p = 0.47) and all-cause death (adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.18, p = 0.27). However, the bifurcation 2-stent strategy was associated with worse clinical outcomes than the bifurcation 1-stent strategy in TLR (adjusted HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52, p = 0.002) and definite or probable stent thrombosis (crude HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.32 to 9.33, p = 0.01), despite neutral risk for all-cause death (adjusted HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.36, p = 0.99). There was no definite or probable very late stent thrombosis up to 5 years. In conclusion, long-term outcomes after stent implantation for unprotected LMCA lesions were not dependent on the bifurcation lesion types but related to the bifurcation stenting strategies with worse outcomes for the bifurcation 2-stent strategy.
Multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by systemic lymphadenopathy and inflammatory symptoms that are associated with the overproduction of interleukin 6 (IL-6). Although several nonlymphoid organs can also be damaged in MCD, only a few cases with cardiac complications have been reported to date. We report a case of congestive heart failure in a female patient with MCD. On admission, her echocardiogram revealed a dilated and diffusely hypokinetic left ventricle. No stenosis was evident in the coronary angiogram. A histopathologic examination of a myocardial biopsy specimen showed mildly hypertrophic myocytes without infiltration of plasma cells or amyloid deposits. Repeated administration of an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab (formerly known as MRA), gradually improved the ventricular wall motion over 6 months without any additional treatment for heart failure, suggesting the involvement of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of her cardiomyopathy. This report is the first of MCD complicated by heart failure treated successfully with tocilizumab. Administering tocilizumab in cases of MCD with unexplained cardiac dysfunction is worthwhile, because such a complication could be reversible.
BackgroundThe prognostic impact of relative wall thickness (RWT), ventricular concentricity, is controversial.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data obtained from 4444 consecutive patients who had undergone both transthoracic echocardiography and electrocardiography at our hospital in 2013. Those who presented with a history of previous episodes of myocardial infarctions and severe or moderate valvular disease were excluded from the analysis. We calculated RWT as follows: (2 x diastolic posterior wall thickness) / (the diastolic LV dimension). We defined high RWT as a ratio > 0.42. A total of 3654 patients were categorized into two groups: 492 with high RWT, and 3162 with normal RWT.ResultsThe mean ages of those in the normal and high RWT groups were 64.6 (±standard deviation 16.3) and 71.6 (± 12.7) years, respectively (p<0.001). Prevalence of male sex, history of diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease, and the left atrium volume index was higher for the high RWT group than for the normal RWT group. The median follow-up period was 1274 days (interquartile range, 410–1470). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a constant increase in all-cause death, with cumulative 3-year incidences of 18.3% and 10.8% for the high RWT and normal RWT groups, respectively (log-rank p<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, the increased mortality risk for those with high RWT relative to normal RWT was significant (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.27–2.10). This trend was consistent for the composite of deaths and major adverse cardiac events.ConclusionHigh RWT has a deleterious impact on long-term mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.