A method was devised for separating rat gastric mucosa into three layers each containing a different mucin species. The mucus gel (first layer) was removed by stirring the gastric mucosa in a solution of phosphate-buffered saline containing 2% N-acetylcysteine. The surface mucosa (second layer), rich in surface mucus cells, was then separated from the deep mucosa (third layer) containing mucus neck cells, by scraping with forceps. The effectiveness of this method was confirmed by light microscopical observation after GOCTS-PCS (dual staining by the galactose oxidase-cold thionin Schiff method and paradoxical concanavalin A method) and AB-PAS staining (dual staining with alcian blue and the periodic acid Schiff method). The fixed specimen of scraped mucus and cell debris was rich in AB-PAS and GOCTS positive mucus, but was hardly stained by PCS, indicating mucus derived from surface mucus cells to have been efficiently recovered from this preparation. The residual mucosa could be stained by PCS but hardly at all by AB-PAS or GOCTS. The lyophilized powder specimens obtained from the three different layers of rat gastric mucosa were used to extract and quantify mucus glycoprotein (mucin). This was done to examine changes in mucin content in the three layers of gastric mucosa one hour following the oral administration of 20% ethanol or 0.35 N hydrochloric acid, both mild irritants. Mucin content was noted to significantly increase in the first layer but hardly at all in the second layer. In the third layer, it decreased significantly by 0.35 N hydrochloric acid, but changed only slightly by 20% ethanol administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

The effects of tetragastrin on mucus glycoprotein (mucin) metabolism and mucosal protection in rat gastric mucosa were investigated. Rats were administered with various doses of tetragastrin (12, 120, or 400 micrograms/kg body weight; s.c.), followed by 50% ethanol-induced gastric injury. Tetragastrin caused a significant increase in mucin content in the corpus mucosa and prevented 50% ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage in a dose-dependent manner. For assessment of the effects of tetragastrin on the metabolism of gastric mucin in detail, changes in mucin distribution in the three different layers of rat gastric mucosa were examined one hour after single administration of tetragastrin. A significant increase in the mucin content was noted in the mucus gel and surface mucosal layer. Mucin content in the deep mucosa corresponding mainly to the mucus neck cell mucin underwent virtually no change by this treatment. An increase in mucin in the mucus gel and surface mucosa would thus appear due to the administration of tetragastrin and may possibly be related to the protective action of the gastric mucosa against injury. The data demonstrate a possibility that gastrin may have potential for enhancing gastric mucosal protection associated with mucus secretion and/or mucus synthesis on the surface mucosa of rat gastric mucosa.

The effects of the muscarinic agonist carbachol on the secretion and accumulation of gastric mucus glycoprotein (mucin) were examined. Gastric mucin obtained from the soluble mucus, adherent mucus gel, and surface mucosal and deep mucosal layer was isolated and quantified. One hour after the subcutaneous administration of carbachol (0.08-80 micrograms/kg body weight) the deep corpus mucin content had decreased significantly (75% of control), corresponding to an increase (120% of control) in the soluble mucin content with 0.8 microgram/kg of carbachol treatment. These changes were counteracted by 10 mg/kg of pirenzepine (selective M1 antagonist) pretreatment. On a single administration of 10 mg/kg of pirenzepine, deep corpus mucin tended to increase, and soluble mucin decreased significantly (49% of the control). These two drugs failed to cause any significant change in the mucin content of the surface and antral deep mucosa or the adherent mucus gel. The muscarinic agonist and the M1 antagonist are thus shown to accelerate the secretion and accumulation, respectively, of mucin in the deep corpus mucosa. Thus intrinsic M1 receptor may possibly be involved in the secretion of mucin in the gastric deep corpus mucosa.

We examined the effects of histamine on mucin localized in the different regions and layers of rat gastric mucosa by determining the changes in the content as well as the biosynthetic activity of the mucin. In vivo administration of 0.8 mg/kg of histamine, which could not induce a concomitant gastric acid secretion, caused a significant increase in the mucin content in the corpus mucosa, but not in the antral mucosa. This increase was due to a significant accumulation of the mucin in the mucus gel and surface mucosa of the corpus region, whereas that in the deep mucosa did not significantly change. In the in vitro incubation system of rat gastric mucosa, histamine and dibutyryl cyclic AMP significantly increased [³H]-labeled mucin in the corpus. The histamine-induced acceleration of mucin biosynthesis was suppressed by ranitidine, but not pyrilamine. In the antrum, the biosynthetic activity showed no significant change by histamine. These results suggest that histamine promotes mucin metabolism via histamine H₂ receptors in the surface mucosal layer of the corpus.