Shear wave elastography (SWE) has shown promise in distinguishing lymph node malignancies. However, the diagnostic accuracies of various SWE parameters that quantify tissue stiffness are yet to be demonstrated. To evaluate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of different SWE parameters for differentiating lymph node malignancies, we conducted a systematic screening of four databases using the PRISMA guidelines. Lymph node biopsy was adopted as the reference standard. Emax (maximum stiffness), Emean (mean stiffness), Emin (minimum stiffness), and Esd (standard deviation) SWE parameters were subjected to separate meta-analyses. A sub-group analysis comparing the use of Emax in cervical (including thyroid) and axillary lymph node malignancies was also conducted. Sixteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Emax and Esd demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity (0.78 (95% CI: 0.69–0.87); 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68–0.87)), while Emean demonstrated the highest pooled specificity (0.93 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98)). From the sub-group analysis, the diagnostic performance did not differ significantly in cervical and axillary LN malignancies. In conclusion, SWE is a promising adjunct imaging technique to conventional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lymph node malignancy. SWE parameters of Emax and Esd have been identified as better choices of parameters for screening clinical purposes.

Endometrial cancer (EC) and cervical cancer (CC) are common malignancies in women in clinical practice. More uncommon non-ovarian malignancies, such as vulval cancer (VC), are also becoming more prevalent in women of all ages. Currently, there are few comprehensive reviews on the management of these conditions, despite the recent advances in the use of immunotherapy in the management of other forms of cancer. The treatment modalities for EC, CC and VC vary; however, platinum-based chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy are the main forms of treatment. In more advanced or recurrent disease, there is a limited number of efficacious treatments, with many clinicians relying on adjuvant chemotherapy despite the increased rationale for the use of immunotherapy. With the development of the novel adoptive T-cell therapy, intra-tumoural oncolytic viral therapy and cancer vaccines, the landscape of gynaecological cancer management is changing, and it is likely that treatment efficacy and outcomes will improve dramatically. This review aims to summarise the current management of endometrial, cervical and vulval cancer and to evaluate the novel therapies under development, as well as the future of the management of non-ovarian gynaecological malignancies.