Controlled-release urea (CRU-N) fertilizer application is a solution to improve the utilization rate of nitrogen (N), reduce economic costs and improve crop yields. It is significant to study the effects of release CRU-N reduction and the combined application of conventional urea on soil N control and the large-scale maize planting system. In this study, the effects of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer reduction and postponement on soil nitrogen components, enzyme activities, and yields were investigated. Seven treatments were set up in this study, including no N fertilizer (CK), 100% conventional urea (U), 100% controlled-release urea (S), 30% controlled-release urea (SU 3/7 ), 50% controlled-release urea (SU 5/5 ), 70% controlled-release urea (SU 7/3 ) and Sodium Salt of Polyaspartic Acid (PASP)-N. The results showed that mixed CRU-N and urea increased yields and net benefits compared with conventional urea at the same application rate of N, and reduced N loss. The application of CRU-N at 70% for maize represented the best overall effects. Compared with U treatment, soil ammonium nitrogen (NH 4 -N), soil nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3 -N), and microbial biomass nitrogen (SMB-N) of CRU-N at 70% (SU 7/3 ) increased by 35.00%, 15.53%, and 25.04%. However, soil nitrate reductase (S-NR) and urease (S-UA) were the best in SU 5/5 and significantly higher than other treatments. The applications of CRU-N would effectively increase soil N; CRU-N in 50% proportion can promote the maize root growth and improve the efficient utilization of N by soil microorganisms. Like the yields (9186.61 kg/hm 2 ), expertly in the proportion of 70% CRU-N (SU 7/3 ) plays a vital role in a wheat-maize rotation system, which can potentially be used to improve the yields, nitrogen use efficiency, and net benefit with low N losses. In conclusion, using CRU-N fertilize effectively improves soil nitrogen, and various ratios of CRU-N can ensure the continuous release the nutrients during the growing period. And among the different proportions of CRU-N, it is optimal in SU 7/3 .

The effects of polyaspartic acid and different controlled-release fertilizers with urea on dry matter accumulation and distribution, nitrogen absorption and accumulation, and the activities of enzymes involved nitrogen metabolism and yield of corn were studied by using xianyu (XY688), a maize nitrogen efficient cultivar, and Jifeng NO.2 (JF2), a maize nitrogen-inefficient cultivar, as experimental materials and through random blocks experimental design in 2019. For XY688, polyaspartic acid chelated nitrogen fertilizer (PASPN) had the highest yield, which was 21.34% higher than N0 treatment. For JF2, it also had the highest yield under PASPN combined urea treatment, which was 23.44% higher than N0 (no nitrogen fertilizer), and JF2 had a 9.7% lower yield under XY688 treatment. For XY688, PASPN treatment had the largest nitrogen uptake in grain, up to 3.14 kg/hm 2 , and PASPN treatment increased 17.4% compared with N0. For JF2, grain nitrogen uptake was also the highest under PASPN treatment, which was significantly different from other treatments. Nitrogen uptake was 3.16 kg/hm 2 , which increased 37.4% compared with N0. Compared with JF2, XY688 showed higher nitrogen uptake efficiency, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and partial nitrogen productivity. For XY688, the highest nitrogen absorption efficiency was SU3 (slow-release urea and ordinary urea) treatment (0.36 kg/kg). The partial nitrogen productivity and harvest index of PASPN treatment were the highest and significantly different from other treatments. The partial nitrogen productivity of PASPN treatment was 57.02 kg/kg. These results can provide help for the further researches of the rational utilization and absorption of nitrogen fertilizer.

Several clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in COVID-19 patients. Recently, there have been reports on critical patients, which are different from previous research results. Studies were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases on January 31, 2023. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of hospitalised adults with COVID-19. This study is registered with INPLASY , number 202310086. A total of 3010 patients were included in our analyses. All included studies were randomized controlled trials or prospective study. There was no difference in 14-day mortality between the two groups (OR 0.23 [95% CI 0.03–1.84], I²=72%, P=0.17). In subgroup analyses we found that baricitinib did not seem to improve significantly in 24-day mortality critically ill patients (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.35–1.02], I²=0%, P=0.06). Fortunately, baricitinib have led to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays for COVID-19 patients. There were no difference in infections and infestations, major adverse cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Baricitinib is safe. At the same time, we can find that it reduces the mortality of COVID-19 patients, but the prognosis of the critically ill patients is not significantly improved.

No abstract

Increased complexity of microbial networks can contribute to increased biodiversity and multifunctionality and thus crop productivity. However, it is not clear which combination ratio of regular and controlled-release urea will increase the soil microbial community complexity and improve maize yield in the North China Plain. To address this knowledge gap, a 2-year field experiment was conducted to explore the effects of the combination of regular (U) and controlled release (S) urea ratios [no fertilizer control (CT), regular urea alone (U), controlled-release urea alone (S), controlled-release urea mixed with regular urea 3:7 (SU3), controlled-release urea mixed with regular urea 5:5 (SU5), and controlled-release urea mixed with regular urea 7:3 (SU7)] on XianYu 688 yield and its rhizosphere and bulk soil microbial community composition and network complexity at different fertility stages. The combination of controlled-release and regular urea increased the N agronomic efficiency, N partial factors productivity, maize yield, and grain number per spike, with the maximum maize yield (9,186 kg ha–1) being achieved when the ratio of controlled-release urea to regular urea was 3:7 (SU3, p < 0.05). Maize yield increased by 13% in the SU3 treatment compared to the CT treatment. Rhizosphere soil microbial diversity remained stable at the silking stage of maize while increased at the physiological maturity stage of maize, with the increasing controlled-release to regular N fertilizer ratios (from 3:7 to 7:3, p < 0.05). This result suggests that a combination of regular and controlled-release N fertilizer can still substantially increase soil microbial diversity in the later stages of maize growth. The combination of controlled-release and regular urea is more effective in improving microbial network total links and average degree, and N agronomic efficiency (R2 = 0.79, p < 0.01), N partial factor productivity (R2 = 0.79, p < 0.01), spikes per unit area (R2 = 0.54, p < 0.05), and maize yield (R2 = 0.42, p < 0.05) increased with the microbial network complexity. This result indicates that the higher microbial network complexity is strongly associated with the higher N agronomic efficiency and N partial factors productivity and maize yield. In conclusion, the ratio of controlled-release to regular urea at SU3 not only increases the yield of maize and N agronomic efficiency but also enhances microbial diversity and network complexity in the North China Plain.