SummaryPercutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of a severe calcified lesion is still one of the most technically challenging areas of interventional cardiology. Calcified lesions are a cause of stent underexpansion, which significantly increases the subsequent risks of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis, even when drug-eluting stents are used. In this report, we describe the usefulness of prolonged inflations using a scoring balloon catheter (Scoreflex) for severe calcified lesions. Prolonged inflation using a scoring balloon enables an adequate dilation for treatment of a severe calcified plaque that was unresponsive to conventional technique with or without rotational atherectomy.(Int Heart J 2017; 58: 982-987) Key words: Calcified plaque and indentation, Scoreflex T he use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) reduces the risks of repeat revascularization without an increase in death and myocardial infarction compared with the standard bare-metal stents. However, the risk of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis (ST) after DES implantation still remains.Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of a severe calcified lesion is still one of the most technically challenging areas of interventional cardiology.

This cross-sectional study examined nurses' eHealth literacy, health education experiences, and confidence in health education regarding online health information and explored their association. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed among 442 nurses in Japan from September 2020 to March 2021. The survey items were the Japanese version of the eHealth Literacy Scale, health education experiences and confidence in health education regarding online health information, and sociodemographic variables. The final analysis comprised 263 responses. Nurses' mean eHealth literacy was 21.89. Most nurses had never received questions regarding online health information in search (66.9%), evaluation (85.2%), and utilization (81.0%) from their patients. Further, most nurses lacked experience (84.0%-89.7%) and confidence (94.7%-97.3%) in health education regarding online health information. The factor associated with having health education experience regarding online health information was eHealth literacy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.15). Factors associated with having confidence in health education regarding online health information were eHealth literacy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.43) and having learning experiences regarding eHealth literacy (adjusted odds ratio, 7.36; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-26.39). Our findings suggest the importance of enhancing eHealth literacy among nurses and a proactive approach by nurses to improve patients' eHealth literacy.

No abstract

No abstract