Pituitary adenomas are one of the most common benign neoplasms of the central nervous system. Although emerging evidence suggests roles for both genetic and epigenetic factors in tumorigenesis, the degree to which these factors contribute to disease remains poorly understood. A multiplatform analysis was performed to identify the genomic and epigenomic underpinnings of disease among the three major subtypes of surgically resected pituitary adenomas in 48 patients: growth hormone (GH)-secreting ( = 17), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting ( = 13, including 3 silent-ACTH adenomas), and endocrine-inactive ( = 18). Whole-exome sequencing was used to profile the somatic mutational landscape, whole-transcriptome sequencing was used to identify disease-specific patterns of gene expression, and array-based DNA methylation profiling was used to examine genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation. Recurrent single-nucleotide and small indel somatic mutations were infrequent among the three adenoma subtypes. However, somatic copy-number alterations (SCNA) were identified in all three pituitary adenoma subtypes. Methylation analysis revealed adenoma subtype-specific DNA methylation profiles, with GH-secreting adenomas being dominated by hypomethylated sites. Likewise, gene-expression patterns revealed adenoma subtype-specific profiles. Integrating DNA methylation and gene-expression data revealed that hypomethylation of promoter regions are related with increased expression of and genes in GH-secreting adenomas and gene in ACTH-secreting adenomas. Finally, multispectral IHC staining of immune-related proteins showed abundant expression of PD-L1 among all three adenoma subtypes. Taken together, these data stress the contribution of epigenomic alterations to disease-specific etiology among adenoma subtypes and highlight potential targets for future immunotherapy-based treatments. This article reveals novel insights into the epigenomics underlying pituitary adenomas and highlights how differences in epigenomic states are related to important transcriptome alterations that define adenoma subtypes. .
Optimal treatment of brain metastases is often hindered by limitations in diagnostic capabilities. To meet this challenge, here we profile DNA methylomes of the three most frequent types of brain metastases: melanoma, breast, and lung cancers (n = 96). Using supervised machine learning and integration of DNA methylomes from normal, primary, and metastatic tumor specimens (n = 1860), we unravel epigenetic signatures specific to each type of metastatic brain tumor and constructed a three-step DNA methylation-based classifier (BrainMETH) that categorizes brain metastases according to the tissue of origin and therapeutically relevant subtypes. BrainMETH predictions are supported by routine histopathologic evaluation. We further characterize and validate the most predictive genomic regions in a large cohort of brain tumors (n = 165) using quantitative-methylation-specific PCR. Our study highlights the importance of brain tumor-defining epigenetic alterations, which can be utilized to further develop DNA methylation profiling as a critical tool in the histomolecular stratification of patients with brain metastases.
A tumor-negative sentinel node (SN) does not eliminate the chance of melanoma recurrence. Patterns of metastasis can be identified and characterized in patients with tumor-negative SNs. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Melanoma referral center. Patients: Patients who underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy between 1995 and 2002 and whose SNs were negative for metastasis by hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry staining were included in the study. The SN specimens from patients with recurrent disease were reexamined for missed metastasis. Main Outcome Measures: Differences in survival related to sites of recurrence and the rate of falsenegative histopathologic SN diagnosis were determined. Results: At a median follow-up of 36.7 months, 69 (8.9%) of 773 patients with tumor-negative SNs had recurrent disease. Three-year survival after first recurrence was 17.1% in the 37 patients with distant recurrence, 48.7% in the 19 patients with local or in-transit recurrence, and 63.5% in the 13 patients with regional basin recurrence; the difference in survival between patients with local or regional and distant recurrences was statistically significant (PϽ.001). Histopathologic reexamination of SNs from the 69 patients identified 9 patients with falsenegative SNs; 2 of these had same-basin recurrences. Conclusions: The SN is a valuable prognostic indicator because only 8.9% of patients with tumor-negative SNs will develop recurrence. The low incidence (1.7%) of regional basin recurrence in patients with negative SNs supports the accuracy of our current method of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy to identify occult regional nodal basin metastasis.
Significant advances over the last 2 decades in imaging technology, instrumentation, anatomical knowledge, and reconstructive techniques have resulted in the endonasal endoscopic approach becoming an integral part of modern skull base surgery. With growing use and greater experience, surgical outcomes continue to incrementally improve across many skull base pathologies, including those tumors that impact vision and ocular motility. The importance of the learning curve and use of a multi-disciplinary approach is critical to maximizing success, minimizing complications, and enhancing quality of life in these patients. Realizing the limits of the endonasal route and reasonable use of transcranial approaches such as the supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy, it may br appropriate to consider nonsurgical therapy including various forms of radiotherapy [corrected] and medical treatment options.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.