18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) has been widely used as a hypoxia imaging probe for diagnostic positron emission tomography (PET). FMISO is believed to accumulate in hypoxic cells via covalent binding with macromolecules after reduction of its nitro group. However, its detailed accumulation mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the chemical forms of FMISO and their distributions in tumours using imaging mass spectrometry (IMS), which visualises spatial distribution of chemical compositions based on molecular masses in tissue sections. Our radiochemical analysis revealed that most of the radioactivity in tumours existed as low-molecular-weight compounds with unknown chemical formulas, unlike observations made with conventional views, suggesting that the radioactivity distribution primarily reflected that of these unknown substances. The IMS analysis indicated that FMISO and its reductive metabolites were nonspecifically distributed in the tumour in patterns not corresponding to the radioactivity distribution. Our IMS search found an unknown low-molecular-weight metabolite whose distribution pattern corresponded to that of both the radioactivity and the hypoxia marker pimonidazole. This metabolite was identified as the glutathione conjugate of amino-FMISO. We showed that the glutathione conjugate of amino-FMISO is involved in FMISO accumulation in hypoxic tumour tissues, in addition to the conventional mechanism of FMISO covalent binding to macromolecules.

(R,S)‐ketamine exerts robust antidepressant effects in patients with depression when given at sub‐anesthetic doses. Each of the enantiomers in this racemic mixture, (R)‐ketamine and (S)‐ketamine, have been reported to exert antidepressant effects individually. However, the neuropharmacological effects of these enantiomers and the mechanisms underlying their antidepressive actions have not yet been fully elucidated. Therefore, we investigated the effect of (R,S)‐, (R)‐, and (S)‐ketamine on brain activity by functional MRI (fMRI) in conscious rats and compared these with that of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist MK‐801 (n = 5~7). We also assessed their pharmacokinetic profiles (n = 4) and their behavioral effects (n = 7~9). This pharmacological MRI study revealed a significant positive response to (S)‐ketamine specifically in the cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum. In contrast, negative fMRI responses were observed in various brain regions after (R)‐ketamine administration. (R,S)‐ketamine, evoked significant positive fMRI responses specifically in the cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum, and this fMRI response pattern was comparable with that of (S)‐ketamine. MK‐801‐induced similar fMRI response pattern to (S)‐ketamine. The fMRI responses to (S)‐ketamine and MK‐801 showed differential temporal profiles, which corresponded with brain concentration profiles. (S)‐ketamine and MK‐801 significantly increased locomotor activity, while (R)‐ketamine produced no noticeable change. (R,S)‐ketamine tended to increase locomotor activity. Our novel fMRI findings show that (R)‐ketamine and (S)‐ketamine induce completely different fMRI response patterns on rat, and that the response produced by the latter is similar to that elicited by an NMDAR antagonist. Our findings provide insight into the antidepressant mechanism of (R,S)‐ketamine.

Objective 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), a well-known PET imaging probe for diagnosis of hypoxia, is believed to accumulate in hypoxic cells via covalent binding with macromolecules after reduction of the nitro group. Previously, we showed the majority of 18F-FMISO was incorporated into low-molecular-weight metabolites in hypoxic tumors, and the glutathione conjugate of reduced FMISO (amino-FMISO-GS) distributed in the tumor hypoxic regions as revealed by imaging mass spectrometry (IMS). The present study was conducted to clarify whether FMISO is metabolized to amino-FMISO-GS within tumor cells and how amino-FMISO-GS contributes to FMISO accumulation in hypoxic cells. We also evaluated the relationship between FMISO accumulation and the glutathione conjugation-related factors in the cells.MethodsTumor cells (FaDu, LOVO, and T24) were treated with 18F-FMISO and incubated under normoxic or hypoxic conditions for 4 h. The FMISO metabolites were analyzed with LC–ESI–MS. Several glutathione conjugation-related factors of tumor cells were evaluated in vitro. FaDu tumor-bearing mice were intravenously injected with 18F-FMISO and the tumors were excised at 4 h post-injection. Autoradiography, IMS and histologic studies were performed.ResultsAmino-FMISO-GS was the main contributor to FMISO incorporated in hypoxic FaDu cells in vitro and in vivo. Total FMISO uptake levels and amino-FMISO-GS levels were highest in FaDu, followed by LOVO, and then T24 (total uptake: 0.851 ± 0.009 (FaDu), 0.617 ± 0.021 (LOVO) and 0.167 ± 0.006 (T24) % dose/mg protein; amino-FMISO-GS: 0.502 ± 0.035 (FaDu), 0.158 ± 0.013 (LOVO), and 0.007 ± 0.001 (T24) % dose/mg protein). The glutathione level of FaDu was significantly higher than those of LOVO and T24. The enzyme activity of glutathione-S-transferase catalyzing the glutathione conjugation reaction in FaDu was similar levels to that in LOVO, and was higher than that in T24. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression levels of efflux transporters of the glutathione conjugate (multidrug resistance-associated protein 1) were lowest in FaDu, followed by LOVO, and then T24.ConclusionsFMISO accumulates in hypoxic cells through reductive metabolism followed by glutathione conjugation. We illustrated the possibility that increased production and decreased excretion of amino-FMISO-GS contribute to FMISO accumulation in tumor cells under hypoxic conditions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12149-017-1189-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.