The paper is devoted to the study of the interrelationship between climate change and human rights, identifying the emergency of the climate change problem and its direct impact on fundamental human rights. The provisions of key international legal acts in the sphere of climate change adaptation and mitigation are analyzed, focusing on human rights implications in the context of climate change. It is stated that human-driven climate change has a negative impact on the environment, human life and health, thus having a profound impact on a wide range of human rights. The analyses of particular human rights affected by climate change is carried out. These are the right to life, the right to self-determination, the right to development, the right to food, the right to health, the right to water and sanitation, the right to education, the right to housing and the rights of future generations. It is noted that despite the international recognition of the negative impact of climate change on the fundamental human rights, the developed measures for tackling climate change and thus for elimination and prevention of such impact are ineffective. It is mentioned that currently in Ukraine there is no formed national legal framework on climate change, while climate change regulatory provisions are mainly based on the provisions of strategic document, that have been formed as a response to international climate change obligations.

The article presents a study of the legal regulation of women and persons with family responsibilities. An analysis of domestic regulations on this topic. In particular, the norms enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine have been studied. Chapter XII, which deals with women's labor, is analyzed in the Labor Code. The Law of Ukraine "On Labor Protection" and the Law of Ukraine "On Ensuring Equal Rights and Opportunities for Women and Men", the draft Labor Code were also considered. International normative legal acts are analyzed. ILO Conventions: No45 - on the use of women in underground work in mines of any kind, No100 - on equal pay for men and women for work of equal value, No103 - on maternity protection, No111 - on discrimination in employment and occupations, No156 - on equal treatment and equal opportunities for working men and women: workers with family responsibilities; Article 11 of the 1979 UN Convention. It is noted that for working women there are: guarantees for part-time work, a ban on the involvement of pregnant women and women with children under 3 years of age, night, overtime work, work on weekends and sending them on business trips; restricting the involvement of women with children aged 3 to 14 or children with disabilities in overtime work and sending them on business trips; maternity leave and childcare leave; the procedure for granting leave to care for a child and enrolling him in the length of service; leave for women who have adopted children; additional leave for employees who have children; guarantees of employment and prohibition of dismissal of pregnant women and women with children; providing pregnant women and women with children under the age of 14 with vouchers to sanatoriums, rest homes and financial assistance; mother's service at enterprises, organizations; guarantees that also apply to parents raising children without a mother, as well as to guardians (trustees). Deficiencies in the current labor legislation have been identified. Gender inequalities in the workplace have been identified. The conclusions and prospects for the development of protection and protection of the rights of women and persons with family responsibilities are presented.

The article presents a study of the problem of abuse of civil procedural rights. It is noted that the issue of abuse of procedural rights in civil proceedings in the modern world is very relevant and currently not fully resolved. The analysis of normative-legal documents in this sphere is carried out. In particular, the norms of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine have been studied. Attention is drawn to the Information Letter of the Supreme Commercial Court of Ukraine dated March 15, 2010 “On some issues of prevention of abuse of procedural rights in commercial litigation” and the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of June 12, 2009 № 5 “On the application of the rules of civil procedural law governing the proceedings before the trial”. Judicial practice concerning abuse of civil procedural rights is analyzed. The international normative legal acts are studied, namely: The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The definition of “abuse of civil procedural rights” is given, as well as the signs of this procedural institution. The article also pays attention to the types and classification of abuse of civil procedural rights. The means of preventing the abuse of civil procedural rights are analyzed: the grounds for applying coercive measures to a person, including a fine, are determined. Problems related to a person's unfair use of his procedural rights have been identified. An analysis of case law on situations where a person's behavior is recognized as an abuse of their procedural rights. Conclusions and gaps related to the issue of abuse of procedural rights in civil proceedings are presented.

The paper presents a study of the problem of protection and protection of copyright rights in international private law. It is noted that the issue of protection and protection of copyright in the modern world is very relevant and currently not fully resolved. An analysis of international treaties, to which Ukraine is a party, has been carried out. In particular, the norms of the Berne Convention, the World Geneva Convention on Copyright of 1952, the Treaty of the World Intellectual Property Organization on Copyright (BOIB Treaty), the Agreement on Trade Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) were studied. The main attention in this paper is devoted to copyright objects. It was determined that the objects of copyright include international treaties to which Ukraine is a party. It was also analyzed what differences exist in the basic conventions regarding the list of objects of copyright protection. The following criteria for the classification of copyright objects were studied: by scope of protection; by the level of accessibility for the public; by the degree of detail of their legal regulation; according to the term of legal protection. It is indicated that they are protected, unprotected, and limited copyright objects. The requirements that must be fulfilled in order for the work to receive the status of being released to the world have been studied. It has been analyzed which general and special terms of legal protection of copyright objects are established. Problems related to regulation, protection and proof of copyright infringement on the Internet have been identified. It is noted that authors have property and non-property copyrights, as well as that these rights include international treaties. Conclusions and prospects for the development of copyright protection and protection are given.