No abstract

We analyzed signaling mechanisms for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production following activation of proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), a thrombin receptor, in preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. PAR1 stimulation caused PGE2 release, an effect suppressed by inhibitors of COX-1, COX-2, iPLA2, cPLA2, MAP kinases (MAPKs), Src, EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), but not by an intracellular Ca2+ chelator or inhibitors of PI3 kinase, protein kinase C (PKC) and NF-κB. PAR1 activation induced phosphorylation of MAPKs and upregulation of COX-2. The phosphorylation of p38 MAPK was suppressed by inhibitors of Src and EGFR-TK. The COX-2 upregulation was dependent on ERK, p38, EGFR-TK, Src, and COX-2 itself. PAR1 activation also induced MEK-dependent phosphorylation of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB). All inhibitors of EP1, EP2, EP3 and EP4 receptors suppressed the PAR1-triggered PGE2 release. Exogenously applied PGE2 facilitated PAR1-triggered COX-2 upregulation, but it alone had no effect. Together, the PAR1-mediated PGE2 production in MC3T3-E1 cells appears to involve iPLA2 and cPLA2 for arachidonic acid release, and the MEK/ERK/CREB and Src/MMP/EGFR/p38 pathways for COX-2 upregulation, which is facilitated by endogenous PGE2 formed by COX-2. These signaling mechanisms might underlie the role of the thrombin/PAR1/PGE2 system in the early stage of the bone healing.

Proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), upon activation, exerts prostanoid-dependent gastroprotection, and increases prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) release through cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) upregulation in rat gastric mucosal epithelial RGM1 cells. However, there is a big time lag between the PAR1-triggered PGE(2) release and COX-2 upregulation in RGM1 cells; that is, the former event takes 18 h to occur, while the latter rapidly develops and reaches a plateau in 6 h. The present study thus aimed at clarifying mechanisms for the delay of PGE(2) release after PAR1 activation in RGM1 cells. Although a PAR1-activating peptide, TFLLR-NH(2), alone caused PGE(2) release at 18 h, but not 6 h, TFLLR-NH(2) in combination with arachidonic acid dramatically enhanced PGE(2) release even for 1-6 h. TFLLR-NH(2) plus linoleic acid caused a similar rapid response. CP-24879, a Δ(5)/Δ(6)-desaturase inhibitor, abolished the PGE(2) release induced by TFLLR-NH(2) plus linoleic acid, but not by TFLLR-NH(2) alone. The TFLLR-NH(2)-induced PGE(2) release was not affected by inhibitors of cytosolic phospholipase A(2) (cPLA(2)), Ca(2+)-independent PLA(2) (cPLA(2)) or secretory PLA(2) (sPLA(2)), but was abolished by their mixture or a pan-PLA(2) inhibitor. Among PLA(2) isozymes, mRNA of group IIA sPLA(2) (sPLA(2)-IIA) was upregulated following PAR1 stimulation for 6-18 h, whereas protein levels of PGE synthases were unchanged. These data suggest that the delay of PGE(2) release after COX-2 upregulation triggered by PAR1 is due to the poor supply of free arachidonic acid at the early stage in RGM1 cells, and that plural isozymes of PLA(2) including sPLA(2)-IIA may complementarily contribute to the liberation of free arachidonic acid.

No abstract

We previously showed that activation of proteinase‐activated receptor‐1 (PAR1) caused delayed (18 h later) PGE2 release in rat gastric mucosal epithelial RGM1 cells, although the maximal up‐regulation of COX‐2 protein was observed much earlier (6 h later). In this study, we analyzed mechanisms for the delay of PGE2 release caused by PAR1 stimulation in RGM1 cells. Stimulation with a PAR1‐activating peptide, TFLLR‐NH2 (TF), in combination with arachidonic acid (AA) or linoleic acid (LA) induced rapid and synergistic increase in PGE2 release within 3 h. CP‐24879, a Δ5/Δ6‐desaturase inhibitor, suppressed the PGE2 release induced by TF plus LA, but not by TF plus AA or TF alone, at 18 h. The TF‐induced delayed PGE2 release was suppressed by combined application of inhibitors of cPLA2, iPLA2 and sPLA2, but not by each of them. Protein levels of microsomal PGE synthase (mPGES)‐1, mPGES‐2 and cytosolic PGES were unchanged by stimulation with TF. These data suggest that the delay of PAR1‐triggered PGE2 release is due to slowly developing AA production in RGM1 cells, and that three isozymes of PLA2 may complementarily contribute to the AA production.