Much of the previous literature has focused on reviewing social capital to discuss its impact, even the profit or loss, but social capital research still has a gap, that is, the possible different mechanisms of its influence process. In view of this gap, this study differs from previous studies by further discussing the various possibilities that may affect the relationship between the social capital and job performance of sales agents. This study discusses whether the relationship between social capital and job performance is affected by corporate social responsibility (CSR), workplace friendship, and proactive personality. Therefore, the purposive sampling method is adopted, where the research object is the full-time sales agents in Taiwan’s finance and insurance brokerage industry.The results of this study showed a positive relationship exists between four conditions: social capital and job performance, corporate social responsibility strengthening social capital and job performance, workplace friendship strengthening social capital and job performance, and proactive personality strengthening social capital and job performance.

Much of the previous literature has focused on reviewing social capital to discuss its impact, even the profit or loss, but social capital research still has a gap, that is, the possible different mechanisms of its influence process. In view of this gap, this study differs from previous studies by further discussing the various possibilities that may affect the relationship between the social capital and job performance of sales agents. This study discusses whether the relationship between social capital and job performance is affected by corporate social responsibility (CSR), workplace friendship, and proactive personality. Therefore, the purposive sampling method is adopted, where the research object is the full-time sales agents in Taiwan’s finance and insurance brokerage industry.The results of this study showed a positive relationship exists between four conditions: social capital and job performance, corporate social responsibility strengthening social capital and job performance, workplace friendship strengthening social capital and job performance, and proactive personality strengthening social capital and job performance.

When a worker dies due to an occupational accident, the labor insurance death benefit being applied for by his/her survivors subject to more conditions due to the revision of the Act. When the survivor does not meet the requirements, the labor insurance will not be paid. At this time, the survivor of the occupational accident worker shall instead turn to the employer for compensation to pay the labor insurance premium as the Bureau of Labor Insurance did not pay. The employer had to pay out of its pocket to compensate the survivor for the absurdity of the death compensation by the Labor Standards Act. A large company can take care of family members in terms of corporate responsibility or financial resources, if it is a small and medium-sized enterprise or even a microenterprise, it cannot pay this huge amount, and family members have to fight for compensation through litigation. However, it is not commonly known that the premiums of the labor accident insurance are not shared by the government or workers, and 100% of the total amount is paid by the employer.

We established a stress-history-dependent porosity model of potential target rocks for CO 2 geosequestration based on rock sample porosity measurements under various effective stresses (5 -120 MPa). The measured samples were collected from shallow boreholes (< 300 m depth) drilled at the frontal fold in northern Taiwan. The lithology, density, and the stress-history-dependent porosity derived from shallow boreholes enabled us to predict the porosity-depth relationship of given rock formations at (burial depths of approximately 3170 -3470 m) potential sites for CO 2 geosequestration located near the Taoyuan Tableland coastline. Our results indicate that the porosity of samples derived from laboratory tests under atmospheric pressure is significantly greater than the porosity measured under stress caused by sediment burial. It is therefore strongly recommended that CO 2 storage capacity assessment not be estimated from the porosity measured under atmospheric pressure. Neglecting the stress history effect on the porosity of compacted and uplifted rocks may induce a percentage error of 7.7% at a depth of approximately 1000 m, where the thickness of the eroded, formerly overlying formation is 2.5 km in a synthetic case. The CO 2 injection pressure effect on the porosity was also evaluated using the stress-historydependent porosity model. As expected, the pore pressure buildup during CO 2 injection will induce an increase in the rock porosity. For example, a large injection pressure of 13 MPa at a depth of approximately 1000 m will increase the rock porosity by a percentage error of 6.7%. Our results have implications for CO 2 storage capacity injection pressure estimates.