CT-P13 may have biosimilarity and interchangeability with its originator in inflammatory bowel disease. A large, randomized, double-blind, prospective study is needed.
Visceral adiposity measured by VAT, VAT/SAT, and waist circumference is associated with an increased risk of IBS, especially of IBS-D. However, neither SAT nor BMI are associated with an increased risk of IBS.
PurposePatients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) should be treated as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) according to guidelines published in 2005. However, controversy still exists on whether the high mortality of NHAP results from multidrug resistant pathogens or underlying disease. We aimed to outline differences and factors contributing to mortality between NHAP and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients aged 65 years or older with either CAP or NHAP from 2008 to 2014. Patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia other than NHAP or HAP were excluded.ResultsAmong 317 patients, 212 patients had CAP and 105 had NHAP. Patients with NHAP had higher mortality, more frequently used a ventilator, and had disease of higher severity than CAP. The incidences of aspiration, tube feeding, and poor functional status were higher in NHAP. Twenty three out of 54 NHAP patients and three out of 62 CAP patients had multidrug resistant pathogens (p<0.001). Eleven patients with NHAP died at discharge, compared to 7 patients with CAP (p=0.009). However, there was no association between mortality rate and presence of multidrug-resistant pathogens. The number of involved lobes on chest X-ray [odds ratio (OR)=1.708; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.120 to 2.605] and use of mechanical ventilation (OR=9.537; 95% CI, 1.635 to 55.632) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.ConclusionPatients with NHAP had higher mortality than patients with CAP. The excess mortality among patients with NHAP and CAP was related to disease severity but not to the presence of multidrug resistant pathogens.
Background: Respiratory failure requiring intubation is a risk factor for mortality in immunocompromised patients, therefore, noninvasive methods to avoid intubation are preferred in such patients. A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is an alternative noninvasive technique for oxygen delivery but can be potentially harmful in cases of delayed intubation. We sought to identify the physiological predictors of outcome to assess the responsiveness to HFNC of immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of immunocompromised patients treated with HFNC in 2015 and 2016 in a tertiary hospital. Oxygenation was assessed by calculating the SpO 2 /FiO 2 (SF) ratio. Subjects were defined as "SF-improved" when HFNC resulted in an increase in the SF ratio compared with baseline. The values were collected at baseline, 12, 24, and 48 h. Results: Ninety-one patients with a median age of 64 years were analyzed; 68.1% were men. There was no significant difference between the SF 48-improved and the SF 48-nonimproved groups in clinical baseline characteristics or severity of illness as evaluated at the time of initiation of HFNC by APACHE II, SAPS II, and SOFA. The 28-day mortality was significantly lower in the SF 48-improved compared with the SF 48-nonimproved group. In univariate analysis, mortality was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI), poor functional status, do-not-intubate (DNI) status, the "SF 48-improved" group, the reason for immunocompromise, and the severity of illness at the time of initiation of HFNC. In multivariate analysis, "SF 48-improved" group was not significantly associated with increased mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.462; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.107-1.988; P=0.299]. Conclusions: In immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure, an improved SF ratio 48 h after HFNC treatment was associated with improved 28-day mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.