Increasing exposure to smartphones can have a negative impact on ocular health in adolescents.
506C ardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of death in the world. High blood pressure contributes to ≈54% of stroke and 47% of IHD worldwide.1 Managing blood pressure in hypertensive patients is important for the prevention of CVD and the reduction of mortality. 2,3 The use of antihypertensive drug therapy reduces the risk of stroke by an estimated 34% and the risk of IHD by 21%. 4 The definition of medication adherence is that patients take their medications as prescribed, as well as continuing to take a prescribed medication based on the treatment alliance established between the patient and the physician. 5 Adherence to medication among patients with chronic diseases is suboptimal, dropping most dramatically during the first year after the start of therapy. 6,7 For example, half of the patients who are prescribed an antihypertensive drug will discontinue their medication within 1 year of starting the therapy. [8][9][10] Patients with chronic diseases require a good partnership with their physician in order to achieve the long-term outcome goal. Patients who are adherent to antihypertensive drugs are more likely to achieve blood pressure control. A meta-analysis reported that patients adherent to antihypertensive medications showed better blood pressure control, compared with those who were nonadherent (odds ratio, 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-7.37).11 Evidence is mounting that patients who show poor adherence to antihypertensive medication have a higher risk of adverse outcomes, including allcause hospitalization and CVD hospitalization, 12,13 and they have higher healthcare costs 14 compared with patients with good adherence. 12,13,15 A recent cohort study 15 reported that a good-adherence group had a significantly lower incidence of acute cardiovascular events, compared with a group with poor adherence to antihypertension medication (hazard ratio [HR], Abstract-The importance of adherence to antihypertensive treatments for the prevention of cardiovascular disease has not been well elucidated. This study evaluated the effect of antihypertensive medication adherence on specific cardiovascular disease mortality (ischemic heart disease [IHD], cerebral hemorrhage, and cerebral infarction). Our study used data from a 3% sample cohort that was randomly extracted from enrollees of Korean National Health Insurance. Study subjects were aged ≥20 years, were diagnosed with hypertension, and started newly prescribed antihypertensive medication in 2003 to 2004. Adherence to antihypertensive medication was estimated as the cumulative medication adherence. Subjects were divided into good (cumulative medication adherence, ≥80%), intermediate (cumulative medication adherence, 50%-80%), and poor (cumulative medication adherence, <50%) adherence groups. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association between medication adherence and health outcomes. Among 33 728 eligible subjects, 670 (1.99%) died of coronary heart disease or stroke during follow-up. Patients with poor...
IntroductionDiabetes mellitus (DM) is an important risk factor for endocrine cancers; however, the association with thyroid cancer is not clear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between thyroid cancer and DM.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, PUBMED and EMBASE databases through July 2012, using search terms related to diabetes mellitus, cancer, and thyroid cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of the risk of incidence of thyroid cancer from pre-existing diabetes. Of 2,123 titles initially identified, sixteen articles met our inclusion criteria. An additional article was identified from a bibliography. Totally, 14 cohort and 3 case-control studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The risks were estimated using random-effects model and sensitivity test for the studies which reported risk estimates and used different definition of DM.ResultsCompared with individuals without DM, the patients with DM were at 1.34-fold higher risk for thyroid cancer (95% CI 1.11–1.63). However, there was heterogeneity in the results (p<0.0001). Sensitivity tests and studies judged to be high quality did not show heterogeneity and DM was associated with higher risk for thyroid cancer in these sub-analyses (both of RRs = 1.18, 95% CIs 1.08–1.28). DM was associated with a 1.38-fold increased risk of thyroid cancer in women (95% CI 1.13–1.67) after sensitivity test. Risk of thyroid cancer in men did not remain significant (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.80–1.53).ConclusionsCompared with their non-diabetic counterparts, women with pre-existing DM have an increased risk of thyroid cancer.
ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize current evidence regarding the association of parity and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsA systematic search of relevant studies published by December 31, 2015 was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. A random-effect model was used to obtain the summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThirty-two studies had parity categories of 1, 2, and ≥3. The summary RRs for EOC were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.65), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.52), respectively. Small to moderate heterogeneity was observed for one birth (p<0.01; Q=59.46; I2=47.9%). Fifteen studies had breastfeeding categories of <6 months, 6-12 months, and >13 months. The summary RRs were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.87), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.79), respectively. Only small heterogeneity was observed for <6 months of breastfeeding (p=0.17; Q=18.79, I2=25.5%). Compared to nulliparous women with no history of breastfeeding, the joint effects of two births and <6 months of breastfeeding resulted in a 0.5-fold reduced risk for EOC.ConclusionsThe first birth and breastfeeding for <6 months were associated with significant reductions in EOC risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.