Neonatal respiratory failure in the NICU of the provincial cities of China has high mortality and cost that are linked to geographic variability, a male predominance, and low proportion of very preterm infants, characteristic of sociocultural confounding background.

Purpose: A risk assessment score for metastasis based on age, tumor size, and mitotic figures has been suggested for nonorbital solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)/hemangiopericytoma. The authors herein examine the clinicopathological features of recurrent and metastatic orbital SFT and evaluate the existing risk assessment score for orbital SFT. Methods: The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Oncology Database was queried for patients with recurrent or malignant orbital hemangiopericytoma/SFT. The medical records were reviewed for clinical and pathologic findings, treatments, and outcomes. Results: Eight patients from 3 institutions were identified with recurrent orbital hemangiopericytoma/SFT. Median age at diagnosis was 59 years, and 4 patients were women. The mean size of tumor was 2.1 ± 1.1 cm. All patients were initially treated with surgery and experienced local recurrence after a median of 4 (range 0.5–10) years. Five patients were treated with orbital radiation. Two patients also developed distant metastases and eventually died of their disease. Median Ki-67 was 5% (range 1–65%) and 5 mitotic figures/10 high-power fields (range 2–30). The previously described risk stratification model for nonorbital SFT did not correlate with the propensity to develop metastases in this cohort; however, both patients with distant metastasis had > 4 mitotic figures /10 high-power fields. Conclusions: In this cohort of recurrent orbital hemangiopericytoma/SFT, median time to recurrence was 4 years underscoring the importance of careful continued follow-up. The current risk stratification models have limited use for orbital lesions, mostly due to the fact that orbital SFTs are smaller than even the smallest size criteria in this risk assessment model.

Purpose: To review the clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis of patients with malignant mixed tumor (carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma) of the lacrimal gland. Methods: Clinical records and radiographic images were reviewed for patients with malignant mixed tumor of the lacrimal gland treated at the center during 2008–2019. Results: The study included 9 patients (6 men, 3 women) aged 17–66 years (median age, 56 years). Six had primary malignant mixed tumor with no history of orbital lesions, and 3 had previously been diagnosed with pleomorphic adenoma. Tumor, Node, Metastasis classification per the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual were T1aN0M0 in 2 patients, T2aN0M0 in 3 patients, T4bN0M0 in 2 patients, and T4cN0M0 in 2 patients. Two patients underwent orbital exenteration, 6 patients underwent eye-sparing surgery, and 1 patient had an unresectable tumor because of cavernous sinus extension. All patients received radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiotherapy in 3 and proton therapy in 6). All patients received chemotherapy, 8 concurrently with radiotherapy and 1 after radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 70 months. At last contact, 6 patients were alive without evidence of disease; 2 had died of disease, 1 of distant metastasis, and the other of cavernous sinus invasion. Conclusions: The findings suggest that de novo malignant mixed tumor of the lacrimal gland is more common than disease that results from transformation after incomplete resection of lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma. Most cases can be treated with eye-sparing surgery and radiation unless skull base extension is present.

Application of the 8th-edition American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria for eyelid carcinoma changed the T category in 75% of patients. In general, the new 8th-edition American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) designations allow for a more objective and consistent designation of the T category.

Objective To evaluate the prereferral treatment of patients referred to our tertiary care center with recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer for compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Design A prospective recruitment and retrospective chart review. Patients The study included new patients identified at multidisciplinary treatment planning conference from October 1, 2008, to February 1, 2009, who had received prior treatment at an outside institution and presented to our department with recurrent or persistent disease. Main Outcome Measures All facets of prior care were examined, including the time from initial symptoms to diagnosis and whether their prereferral treatment was compliant with or deviated from NCCN guidelines for head and neck cancer. Results A total of 566 consecutive new patients were identified, of whom 107 (18.9%) had persistent or recurrent disease. The average time from first presentation with initial symptoms to diagnosis among patients who presented with persistent disease was 23.8 weeks. Nearly half of the patients who presented with persistent or recurrent disease had either endocrine (21.5%) or cutaneous (24.2%) primary cancers, with the rest of the cases being distributed among 10 other sites. Of the patients who presented with recurrent or persistent disease, 43.0% had prereferral care that was noncompliant with NCCN guidelines. Of these patients, 58.7% had inadequate surgical management, 15.2% were treated for the wrong diagnosis, 10.9% received inadequate adjuvant therapy, 4.4% received inadequate radiotherapy, and 10.9% refused indicated recommended treatment. Conclusions Significant deviation from NCCN guidelines for head and neck cancer treatment was observed in the cohort of study patients. The failure to administer adjuvant therapy when indicated by NCCN guidelines is particularly concerning. Economic and noneconomic costs, including lost wages, cost of “do-over” therapy, and potentially diminished survival, are substantial. Measures to ensure that patients receive therapy according to guidelines should be a national priority.