Objective. To explore the application of professional whole-process case management during nursing in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Methods. This study recruited 60 patients with triple-negative breast cancer who were diagnosed and treated at Department of Breast Surgery in our hospital assessed for eligibility between June 2018 and June 2020, and we assigned them at a ratio of 1 : 1 via the random number table method to receive either general nursing (control group) or professional whole-process case management plus general nursing (observation group). We analyzed and evaluated the hospitalization, the indwelling time of drainage tube, complications, recovery, quality of life, posttraumatic growth, and nursing satisfaction between these two groups at registration, discharge, and the sixth month after surgery, respectively. Results. Professional whole-process case management achieved a shorter duration of drainage tube placement and hospitalization and a lower incidence of postoperative complications versus general nursing ( P < 0.05 ). Moreover, the observation group had got better recovery ( P < 0.05 ) and a better quality of life at discharge and 6 months after surgery ( P < 0.05 ). Professional whole-process case management obtained higher scores of posttraumatic growth and higher nursing satisfaction versus general nursing ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Whole-process case management promotes the postoperative recovery of patients with triple-negative breast cancer and shortens the duration of drainage tube indwelling and hospitalization, which lowers the incidence of postoperative complications, improves their quality of life, and enhances nursing satisfaction.

Objective. To explore the influence of the whole-course case management model on the compliance and satisfaction of breast cancer patients with the whole-course standardized treatment. Methods. Eighty breast cancer patients admitted to our hospital between April 2020 and June 2021 were assigned to receive either conventional nursing (routine group, n = 40) or whole-process case management (experimental group, n = 40) according to different nursing methods. Outcome measures included self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores, self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores, adverse reactions, treatment compliance, and nursing satisfaction. Results. After nursing, the SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the routine group P < 0.05 . The whole case management mode was associated with a significantly lower incidence of adverse reactions versus routine nursing P < 0.05 . The whole case management resulted in higher compliance of patients versus routine nursing P < 0.05 . The experimental group had a significantly higher nursing satisfaction versus the routine group P < 0.05 . Conclusion. The whole-process case management mitigates patients’ negative emotions, strengthens their treatment compliance, lowers the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, and improves nursing satisfaction, which may provide a viable nursing alternative for patients with breast cancer.