The direct problem of microlithography is to simulate printing features on the wafer under given mask, imaging system, and process characteristics. The goal of inverse problems is to find the best mask and/or imaging system and/or process to print the given wafer features. In this study we will describe and compare solutions of inverse mask problems.Pixel-based inverse problem of mask optimization (or "layout inversion") is harder than inverse source problem, especially for partially-coherent systems. It can be stated as a non-linear constrained minimization problem over complex domain, with large number of variables. We compare method of Nashold projections, variations of Fienap phase-retrieval algorithms, coherent approximation with deconvolution, local variations, and descent searches. We propose electrical field caching technique to substantially speedup the searching algorithms. We demonstrate applications of phase-shifted masks, assist features, and maskless printing.
Short-range etch proximity effects increase intra-die CD variability and degrade the IC performance and yield. Tight control of the etch bias is an increasingly critical factor in realizing the ITRS technology nodes. The 2000 technology nodes revision added a new category, the post-etch "physical" gate length metric, that is 9-17% smaller than "in-resist" gate length. We present new etch proximity correction methods and models designed to reduce negative impact of etch-induced CD variability and increase uniformity of the controlled over-etching. Resolution Enhancement Technologies (RET) design correction methods typically employ "lumped" process models. We found that an alternative methodology based upon separation of the process factors and the related models may yield better accuracy, performance, and better suit the design and process optimization flows. The contributions from the reticle, the optics, the wafer, and etch are individually determined and then used either separately or in aggregation for the most flexible and optimum correction of their respective contributions.The etch corrections are based on the Variable Etch Bias model (VEB model). This semi-empirical model requires experimental CD information to be collected from the test patterns under fixed process conditions (point-process model). It demonstrates excellent fit to the early experimental CD-SEM data gathered to date, which spans a variety of layout features and process conditions. The VEB model works in conjunction with Calibre® software system's Variable Threshold ResistExtended (VTR-E) model, however the etching is modeled separately from the optics and the resist processing. This yields better understanding and more accurate explanation of the experiments than those that are produced by the "lumped" process modeling.The VEB model explains etch-induced bias in terms of the following three proximity characteristics or variables: effective trench width (or pattern separation), pattern density, and effective line width (or pattern granularity). We synthesized and studied their integral representations. Performance fitness of the various weighting, smoothing, and anisotropic integral kernels and their parameters were studied to correctly reflect the etch bias behavior on silicon. We found that depending on the resist composition and layer types (poly or metal), the etch bias can sometimes be explained only by one or two (out of three) proximity variables. The aperture and microloading etch effects are studied and shown to be correctly reflected in the model. We demonstrate how model-based corrections improve CD uniformity of the poly and metal layers by compensating for the iso/dense and inverse-iso/dense biases. More complicated 2-D proximity effects are also captured, which is confirmed by the comparison of the SEM images to the simulations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.