Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms are on the tremendous rise for being incorporated into the field of neurosurgery. AI and ML algorithms are different from other technological advances as giving the capability for the computer to learn, reason, and problem-solving skills that a human inherits. This review summarizes the current use of AI in neurosurgery, the challenges that need to be addressed, and what the future holds. Methods: A literature review was carried out with a focus on the use of AI in the field of neurosurgery and its future implication in neurosurgical research. Results: The online literature on the use of AI in the field of neurosurgery shows the diversity of topics in terms of its current and future implications. The main areas that are being studied are diagnostic, outcomes, and treatment models. Conclusion: Wonders of AI in the field of medicine and neurosurgery hold true, yet there are a lot of challenges that need to be addressed before its implications can be seen in the field of neurosurgery from patient privacy, to access to high-quality data and overreliance on surgeons on AI. The future of AI in neurosurgery is pointed toward a patient-centric approach, managing clinical tasks, and helping in diagnosing and preoperative assessment of the patients.
Madam, the catastrophic death toll from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has reached above six million as of April,2022. It has become a global challenge to put an end to this pandemic and hence the exacerbated loss but disparities in international vaccine availability. Ongoing anti-vaccine movements both online, and on-site and the surging mistrust among the masses are the major impediments in achieving substantial international herd immunity., The lack of which causes emergence of new COVID-19 variants/ Primary vaccination against COVID-19 may decrease over time especially against new SARS-COV-2 strains requiring booster dose administration. However, this has led to the development of growing misbelief among the population that the primary vaccination was not efficacious enough and so will be the booster shots, thus, fostering ambiguity and, therefore, vaccine hesitancy in the general population and healthcare workers.1 Concern is being raised about the safety and efficacy of booster doses, particularly of the heterologous regimen, in the context of emerging Covid-19 variants. The shifting trend from homologous vaccination regimen to heterologous vaccination is being increasingly investigated at several study sites across the globe. Studies suggest that the serum antibodies against COVID-19 have increased in the booster dose recipients compared to the non-recipients.2 and higher titer of antibodies are formed in heterologous booster recipients.3 The booster vaccination is well-tolerated among all the recipients irrespective of the booster regimen. The awareness campaigns running in Pakistan seem not to yield a significant response in eliminating the widespread apathy for booster shots. The rampant dissemination of misinformation4, lack of impactful counselling for people and multi-brand vaccination have led to many doubts about vaccine development programs. People ponder over receiving a vaccine that would be effective against multiple COVID-19 variants so that they would not be required to receive any more booster doses. Overcoming the vaccine hesitancy would require the public health professionals to have interactive online and physical awareness sessions with the public, which the collaboration of influential personalities may aid through various electronic and social media platforms.5 This milestone can also be nailed by propagating the authentic hospital records of comparative post-vaccination robustness in immune responses and differences in hospitalization rates, in an manageable easy and comprehensible way, through the print and mass media.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.