Introduction. Sacroiliac rod fixation (SIRF) preserves the mobility of L5/S1 (lumber in the pelvis), as a surgical procedure for high-energy pelvic ring fractures. The concept of SIRF method without pedicle screws into L4 and L5 is called ‘within ring’ concept. Case Presentation. We report here the clinical results of ‘within ring’ concept treatment with sacroiliac rod fixation for a case of displaced H-shaped Rommens and Hofmann classification type IVb fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP), which A 79-year-old woman had been difficult to walk due to pain that had been prolonged for more than one month since her injury. The patient was successfully treated with SIRF, no pain waking with a walking stick and returned to most social activities including living independently within 6 months of the operation. Conclusion. SIRF is useful because it can preserve the mobility in the lumbar pelvis; not including the lumbar spine in the fixation range like spino pelvic fixation is a simple, safe, and low-invasive internal fixation method for displaced H-shaped type IVb fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Intramedullary or cephalomedullary nail removal often is performed during nonunion reoperations. We have experienced a rare case in which it was difficult to remove the lag screw of the antegrade intramedullary nail, requiring a large amount of force to be applied over a long period. Removal of the lag screw is essential for removal of the nail and subsequent revision surgery. In our case, the lag screw could be removed only by cutting the screw with a carbide drill. For cases in which the nail and lag screw are firmly fixed, surgeons should prepare for the possibility of their separation using a carbide drill. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Introduction Fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP), generally involving Rommens and Hoffman classification type IVb (H-shaped) requires spinopelvic fixation (SPF). We report the clinical outcome of sacroiliac rod fixation (SIRF) for FFP type IVb in a case series. Materials and Methods In this retrospective observational study, six patients (mean age, 80.3 years; range, 74-85 years) with FFP type IVb who underwent SIRF since October 2019 and could be followed up for ≥1 year postoperatively were included. All patients were injured in low-energy falls, a patient had a femoral neck fracture, and other had a humeral neck fracture and distal radius fracture. Results The mean (range) operative time was 135 (98-200) min, and mean blood loss was 103 (80-130) g. All patients achieved bone union in an average of 4.3 months. No implant failure or surgical site infection requiring reoperation occurred. No patient complained of iliac screw irritation or requested removal. One patient developed a T12 vertebral fracture at 3 weeks postoperatively. The mean final follow-up period was 17.8 months (13-22 months) and mean final modified Majeed Score (maximum 76 points as the items “work” and “sexual intercourse” were omitted for this study) was 71.7 (56-76). Conclusions SIRF is a less invasive surgical technique than SPF that uses only an S1 pedicle screw and iliac screw. SIRF using the “within ring” concept showed good clinical outcome in FFP type IVb.

Total talar dislocation without a fracture is an extremely rare injury. It is often the result of high-energy trauma, such as that incurred after a fall, or owing to motor or vehicular accidents. Talar dislocations have poor outcomes owing to the frequent complications of infection, avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis attributed to open dislocations. We report herein a closed total talar dislocation without a fracture in a college athlete who was injured during sports activities. Specifically, a 20-year-old man was injured during a soccer game this led to a closed total talar dislocation. We performed closed reduction with image guidance subject to a popliteal sciatic nerve block, and placed a plaster cast below the knee. Radiographic studies after reduction revealed no associated fractures. After an eight week no-weight bearing period, we confirmed that there were no avascular necrosis signs on magnetic resonance images. Based on these findings, partial weight bearing was allowed. At 18 months post trauma, the athlete continues to play soccer despite the fact that he experiences a slight pain and limited range of motion. The blood supply to the talus is limited, and trauma, such as dislocation, can easily injure the blood supply, thus resulting in complications, such as avascular necrosis. The talus vascularity of the presented case was maintained by superior branches. We think that it is important to a) perform closed reduction early on, b) avoid any type of surgical operation that damages the limited talus blood supply, and c) allow weight bearing after the lack of avascular necrosis signs is confirmed. Although there is no standardized treatment, the talar dislocation treatment should be chosen to preserve the blood supply to the talus as much as possible.

No abstract