Background: The efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in severe respiratory failure, especially induced by COVID-19, has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to examine the usefulness of HFNC compared to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) as initial respiratory management for severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure.Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled and categorized the patients with COVID-19-induced severe respiratory failure who were intolerant of conventional oxygen therapy into two groups: 1) patients who initially received HFNC (HFNC group) and 2) patients who initially underwent IMV (IMV group). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were ventilator-free days within 28 days, intensive care unit (ICU)-free days within 28 days, and respiratory failure days defined as the length from day 1 to achieving successful weaning from both HFNC and IMV.Results: We analyzed 182 patients (HFNC group, n=81; IMV group, n=101). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (19% in the HFNC group vs. 25% in the IMV group, p=0.37). Initial use of HFNC was not associated with mortality in the univariate analysis (OR, 0.69; CI, 0.34–1.42; p=0.31) and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis using propensity scoring (OR, 1.01; CI, 0.37–2.77; p=0.984). Ventilator-free days within 28 days were significantly longer in the HFNC group than those in the IMV group (median, 22 days [interquartile range (IQR), 2–28 days] vs. median, 14 days [IQR, 0–20 days], p<0.001). ICU-free days within 28 days were significantly longer in the HFNC group than those in the IMV group (median, 23 days [IQR, 0–28 days] vs. median, 15 days [IQR, 0–20 days], p<0.001). Respiratory failure days were relatively shorter in the HFNC group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.071).Conclusions: Among patients with severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure, HFNC compared to IMV resulted in a statistically significant increase in ventilator-free and ICU-free days within 28 days without increasing in-hospital mortality. This study showed the potential for HFNC to be an effective alternative to IMV as initial respiratory management for severe COVID-19-induced respiratory failure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.