Introduction: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a well-established treatment option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively identified 82 patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT at our institution between November 2009 and September 2019. Among these patients, two developed local recurrence or new primary lung cancer and lung metastasis or new primary lung cancer, respectively, and were treated with repeat SBRT. We herein report a case series of two patients with radiation pneumonitis after repeat SBRT. Case Series: Case A was an 80-year-old woman diagnosed with stage I (T1aN0M0) squamous cell carcinoma. She received initial SBRT at an irradiation dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter. Two years and three months after initial SBRT, the patient was clinically diagnosed with post-SBRT local recurrence or primary lung cancer and, thus, was treated with repeat SBRT at an irradiation dose of 60 Gy in 10 fractions. Six months later, the patient developed grade 5 radiation pneumonitis. Case B was an 89-year-old man diagnosed with stage I (T1cN0M0) adenocarcinoma. He received initial SBRT at an irradiation dose of 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter. Three years and six months after initial SBRT, the patient was clinically diagnosed with post-SBRT lung metastasis or primary lung cancer and, thus, was treated with repeat SBRT at an irradiation dose of 50 Gy in 4 fractions. Six months later, the patient developed grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. Conclusion: Caution is needed when performing repeat SBRT.

Background/Aim: To investigate the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Among consecutive patients with early-stage NSCLC who received SBRT between November 2009 and September 2019, those with cT1-2N0M0 staged by the UICC TNM classification and staging system for lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Fifty-three patients with early-stage NSCLC received SBRT. The median follow-up period was 29 months (range=2-105 months). Twenty-one lung tumors were clinically diagnosed as early-stage primary lung cancers without histological confirmation. Histological examinations revealed adenocarcinoma in 24 patients and squamous cell carcinoma in 8. Two- and 5-year local control, cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 94.4 and 94.4%; 94.6 and 90.8%; 69.0 and 43.3%; and 80.0 and 59.3%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the T stage, histology, and type of pulmonary nodule correlated with PFS and OS. Conclusion: Good clinical outcomes were achieved by patients with early-stage NSCLC who received SBRT.

Background/Aim: To investigate the clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma and analyze the prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma were retrospectively identified among consecutive patients who received CCRT between November 2009 and September 2019 at our institution. The patients were treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (N=13) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (N=26). Results: The median follow-up period was 35 months (range=2-158 months). There were 32 men and 7 women with a median age of 66 years (range=50-83 years). Clinical stages were I in 6 patients, II in 4, III in 19, and IV in 10. Hypopharyngeal invasion was noted in 8 patients. The initial treatment responses were evaluated 3-6 weeks after the final session of CCRT: a complete response (CR) in 24 patients, a partial response (PR) in 13, and stable disease (SD) in 2. Two- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 73.8 and 59.4%, respectively. Two- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 57.8 and 48.0%, respectively. A univariate analysis identified the initial treatment response (CR or non-CR) as a significant factor for OS (p=0.0002) and PFS (p=0.0026). The CR rate was 81.0% in patients with T1-3 and 33.3% in those with T4 (p=0.0038). Conclusion: Patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma in Nagasaki University Hospital in Japan achieved superior outcomes compared with previous studies. CR rate was higher in patients with T1-3 and correlated with better OS.

Background Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard treatment strategy for unresectable limited‐disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which has remained unchanged for over two decades. Based on a previous study that confirmed the non‐inferiority of amrubicin (AMR) plus cisplatin (AP) when compared with EP for extensive‐disease (ED) SCLC, we have previously conducted a phase I study assessing AP with concurrent TRT (2 Gy/time, once daily, 50 Gy in total) for LD‐SCLC therapy. Our findings revealed that AP with concurrent TRT could prolong overall survival to 39.5 months with manageable toxicities. Therefore, we plan to conduct a phase I study to investigate and determine the effect of AP combined with AHTRT, recommended dose (RD), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) of AP in patients with LD‐SCLC. Methods Treatment‐naive patients with LD‐SCLC, age between 20 and 75 years, who had a performance status of 0 or 1 and adequate organ functions will be enrolled. For chemotherapy, cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 /day (day 1) and AMR (day 1 to 3) will be administered with AHTRT (1.5 Gy/time, twice daily, 45 Gy in total). The initial AMR dose is set to 25 mg/m 2 /day. RD and MTD will be determined by evaluating toxicities. Discussion Based on our previous study, the initial dose of AMR 25 mg/m 2 is expected to be tolerated and acceptable. Here, we aim to determine whether treatment with AP and concurrent AHTRT would be an optimal choice with manageable toxicities for LD‐SCLC.