No abstract

Objective. The purpose of this study was to develop a new bolus (HM bolus), with tissue equivalence, transparency, reusability, and free shaping at approximately 40 °C for excellent adhesion, and to evaluate the feasibility of clinically using this bolus as an ideal bolus. Approach. We summarized the advantages and disadvantages of existing boluses. To evaluate dose characteristics, a vinyl gel sheet bolus (Gel bolus) and HM bolus placed on a water-equivalent phantom were used to obtain the percent depth dose (PDD) of electron (6 MeV, 9 MeV) and photon (4 MV, 6 MV) beams. The average dose difference of the HM bolus and Gel bolus was calculated. The Gel bolus, a soft rubber bolus (SR bolus), and HM bolus were placed in adherence to a pelvic phantom. CT images taken after shaping and 1, 2, and 3 weeks after shaping were used to evaluate the adhesion and reproducibility using air gap and dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Main results. The average dose difference for electron beams was 0.16% ± 0.79% and photon beams was 0.06% ± 0.34%, both within 1% of the PDD results. The HM bolus showed the same build-up effect and dose characteristics as the Gel bolus. The mean air gap values for the Gel bolus, SR bolus, and HM bolus were 96.02 ± 43.77 cm3, 34.93 ± 21.44 cm3, and 4.40 ± 1.50 cm3, respectively. The mean DSC values compared to initial images for the Gel bolus, SR bolus, and HM bolus were 0.363 ± 0.035, 0.556 ± 0.042, and 0.837 ± 0.018, respectively. Excellent adhesion was observed in the CT simulation and during the treatment period. Significance. The HM bolus has unique features, such as tissue equivalence, transparency, reusability, and free shaping for excellent adhesion, and is thus an ideal bolus for use in clinical cases.

Purpose To determine the thickness of a soft variable shape tungsten rubber (STR) as a lung compensating filter in total body irradiation. Methods A tough water (TW) phantom and tough lung (TL) phantom were used as water and lung‐equivalent phantoms. The TW with a thickness of 3 cm simulating the thoracic wall was used (upper layer). The TW or TL with a thickness from 1 to 15 cm (1 cm increments) was placed beneath the upper layer (middle layer). The TW with a thickness of 5 cm simulating the mediastinum was placed beneath the middle layer (lower layer), and a farmer ionization chamber was placed beneath this layer. The relative doses of a 10 MV X‐rays were then measured. The TL was compensated in 1 mm increments from 1 to 11 mm of the STR, and the thickness of the STR at the same dose of TW (water equivalent) was obtained. Results The compensating ability of STR increased as the thickness of the TL increased, and an STR with a thickness of 1 mm reduced the dose by 2%–4%, depending on the thickness of lung. The STR thickness as an equivalent dose of TW per cm of TL was approximately linear, and the thickness was 0.62 mm/cm of TL. Conclusion The STR can be used as a lung compensating filter for a water equivalent dose with 0.62 mm of STR per cm of lung.

No abstract