The informed consent procedure applied was satisfactory from a quantitative point of view, and the main items of information were acceptable to the patients. Meerweins's model proved to be applicable and useful for identifying pitfalls in communication. Greater attention should be paid to the indirect messages and implied criticisms of the patients to improve their participation in decision making. Physicians should become more skillful in providing adequate information and improve their methods of communication.

Twenty-four patients with a variety of solid tumors entered a Phase I trial with 4-demethoxydaunorubicin, a new analogue of daunorubicin. The drug was given as a single oral dose of 10-60 mg/m2 repeated every 3-4 weeks. Leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Other toxic effects included mild to moderate nausea and vomiting. Sixty mg/m2 was found to be the maximum tolerated dose in patients with fair tolerance to chemotherapy and normal liver function. Similar hematologic toxicity was reported in patients with very extensive prior chemotherapy or diffuse bone and/or liver metastases receiving 50 mg/m2. However, the wide range of the WBC nadirs reported with the same dose in 'good risk' cases, suggest that 40 mg/m2, increased up to 50 mg/m2 in the absence of significant myelotoxicity, could be more safely proposed as starting dose for Phase II trials. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in five patients given a single dose of 40-60 mg/m2. IMI-30 (NSC 256439) appears to be rapidly absorbed and rapidly eliminated from plasma by means of a rapid and extensive biotransformation to 13-OH-idarubicin. The 13-dihydroderivative was present at higher and more prolonged levels than the parent compound, with an elimination half-life of about 40 hours.

Between 1985 and 1990 the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) for the first time assessed quality of life (QL) variables in 188 patients in a multicenter small-cell lung cancer trial that compared two different regimens of combination chemotherapy. QL-assessment was scheduled at the beginning of each of the six treatment cycles. The self-rating QL questionnaire included an early version of the EORTC QL questionnaire, a mood adjective checklist (Bf-S) and a single linear analogue scale (LASA) measuring general well-being. Compliance with completion of the scheduled questionnaires varied between 37% and 58% over the six cycles, and between 21% and 68% among the 7 participating institutions. Mean compliance was 49%. The institution was found the only significant factor predicting compliance (p < 0.001). Patient age, sex, education and biological prognostic factors at randomization were not predictors of compliance. Although compliance was poor, the data received was of high quality. We suggest practical guidelines for improving compliance with QL data collection in multicenter clinical trials.

No abstract

No abstract