Background Coronaviruses can induce the production of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumour necrosis factor, and other cytokines implicated in autoinflammatory disorders. It has been postulated that anakinra, a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, might help to neutralise the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related hyperinflammatory state, which is considered to be one cause of acute respiratory distress among patients with COVID-19. We aimed to assess the off-label use of anakinra in patients who were admitted to hospital for severe forms of COVID-19 with symptoms indicative of worsening respiratory function.Methods The Ana-COVID study included a prospective cohort from Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph (Paris, France) and a historical control cohort retrospectively selected from the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph COVID cohort, which began on March 18, 2020. Patients were included in the prospective cohort if they were aged 18 years or older and admitted to Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph with severe COVID-19-related bilateral pneumonia on chest x-ray or lung CT scan. The other inclusion criteria were either laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 or typical lung infiltrates on a lung CT scan, and either an oxygen saturation of 93% or less under oxygen 6 L/min or more, or aggravation (saturation ≤93% under oxygen 3 L/min) with a loss of 3% of oxygen saturation in ambient air over the previous 24 h. The historical control group of patients had the same inclusion criteria. Patients in the anakinra group were treated with subcutaneous anakinra (100 mg twice a day for 72 h, then 100 mg daily for 7 days) as well as the standard treatments at the institution at the time. Patients in the historical group received standard treatments and supportive care. The main outcome was a composite of either admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for invasive mechanical ventilation or death.The main analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis (including all patients in the anakinra group who received at least one injection of anakinra). FindingsFrom March 24 to April 6, 2020, 52 consecutive patients were included in the anakinra group and 44 historical patients were identified in the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph COVID cohort study. Admission to the ICU for invasive mechanical ventilation or death occurred in 13 (25%) patients in the anakinra group and 32 (73%) patients in the historical group (hazard ratio [HR] 0•22 [95% CI 0•11-0•41; p<0•0001). The treatment effect of anakinra remained significant in the multivariate analysis (HR 0•22 [95% CI 0•10-0•49]; p=0•0002). An increase in liver aminotransferases occurred in seven (13%) patients in the anakinra group and four (9%) patients in the historical group.Interpretation Anakinra reduced both need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU and mortality among patients with severe forms of COVID-19, without serious side-effects. Confirmation of efficacy will require con trolled trials.
Abstract-Recent studies have shown that large-artery wall remodeling per se does not reduce distensibility in hypertension, indicating qualitative or quantitative changes in arterial components. The aim of the study was to determine in 1-year-old spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) the changes in the elastic properties of large arteries, as assessed by the incremental elastic modulus (E inc ), and the changes in the extracellular matrix, including fibronectin (FN) and ␣51-integrin. The relationship between E inc and circumferential wall stress was calculated from in vivo pulsatile changes in blood pressure and arterial diameter by using a high-resolution echo-tracking system at the site of the abdominal aorta and in vitro medial cross-sectional area. E inc -stress curves and FN and integrin ␣5-subunit contents were determined for each animal. Mean stress and E inc were higher in SHRs than in Wistar rats. However, in a common range of stress, E inc -stress curves for SHRs were superimposable on those for Wistar rats, indicating that wall materials in both strains have equivalent mechanical behavior. Immunohistochemistry indicated that total FN, EIIIA FN isoform, and ␣5-integrin increased in the SHRs aortas without changes in elastin and collagen densities. Key Words: SHR Ⅲ elastic modulus Ⅲ aorta Ⅲ fibronectin Ⅲ ␣51-integrin T he mechanical properties of large arteries play a major role in cardiovascular hemodynamics through the buffering of stroke volume and the propagation of the pressure pulse.1,2 It is well recognized that mechanical properties of large arteries are primarily determined by the composition of the arterial wall. The ECM proteins, mainly collagen and elastin, influence the "passive" mechanical properties of the arterial wall whereas its "active" properties depend on the activation of VSMCs.It was generally accepted that hypertension produced an increase in large-artery stiffness.1-4 However, recent studies have shown that arterial stiffness is not increased, despite wall hypertrophy, in either hypertensive patients or SHRs. [5][6][7][8][9] This finding suggests that sustained hypertension is associated with a rearrangement of the arterial wall material, implying qualitative or quantitative changes in arterial components leading to the mechanical adaptation of the arterial wall.The elastic properties of the arterial wall material depend not only on the SMC, elastin, and collagen contents but also on the way these components are spatially organized within the media. 3,10,11 Through an interaction with specific cellular integrin receptors, FN plays an important role in cell-matrix interactions. In addition, FN may also influence VSMC phenotype.12-14 The present study was undertaken to relate the changes in the elastic properties of the arterial wall material to its composition in the ECM and to focus on FN and its specific receptor, the ␣51-integrin.The interaction of specific ECM proteins with their integrin receptors has been shown to play a central role in transmitting mechanical forces to...
Arterial wall viscosity (AWV) is a potential source of energy dissipation in circulation. That arteries, which are known to be markedly viscous in vitro, have lower viscosity in vivo has been suggested but not demonstrated under similar pressure conditions. Endothelium, which may modulate AWV through smooth muscle tone, could contribute to the low level of viscosity in vivo. Our objectives were first to compare AWV of the rat abdominal aorta, in vivo and in vitro, with similar pulse-pressure waves, and second, to determine whether endothelial function influences AWV in vivo and in vitro. The diameter of the abdominal aorta and distending pressure were measured in vivo and in vitro with a high-resolution echotracking system and a micromanometer, respectively. AWV was calculated as the area of the pressure-volume curve hysteresis. After in vivo examination, the arterial segments were isolated in vitro and submitted to resynthesized pressure waves identical to those recorded in vivo. Deendothelialization was performed in vivo by balloon rubbing; then arteries were examined either in vivo or in vitro. AWV was markedly lower in vivo than in vitro (6.6 +/- 0.7 versus 22.7 +/- 3.7 J.m-1.10(-5), respectively; P < .001). After deendothelialization, a sustained 40% increased AWV was observed during a 15-minute follow-up (P < .01). In vitro, deendothelialized arteries have a 64% higher AWV than segments with endothelium (P < .01). Our results indicate that the physiological effective viscosity, measured in vivo in intact animals, is threefold lower than the intrinsic viscosity of the arterial wall, measured in vitro. Endothelium removal determines a sustained increase in AWV, either in vivo or in vitro. These results suggest that active mechanisms compensate for intrinsic viscosity under physiological conditions. One of these energy-saving mechanisms might be dependent on normal endothelial function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.