Dysregulated activation of the CDK4/6 kinases is a hallmark of most mammary-derived carcinomas. ATP competitive inhibitors against this complex have been recently advanced in the clinic and shown significant activity, particularly against tumors driven by the estrogen receptor (ER). However, resistance to these compounds has begun to emerge often months to years after their initiation. We investigated potential mechanisms of resistance utilizing cell line models which are highly sensitive to this class of drugs. After prolonged exposure to the selective and potent CDK4/6 inhibitor LY2835219, clones emerged and several were found to harbor amplification of the CDK6 kinase. Amplification of CDK6 resulted in a marked increase in CDK6 expression and reduced response of the CDK4/6 target, pRb, to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Knockdown of CDK6 restored drug sensitivity while enforced overexpression of CDK6 was sufficient to mediate drug resistance. Not only did CDK6 overexpression mediate resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, it also led to reduced expression of the ER and progesterone receptor (PR), and diminished responsiveness to ER antagonism. The reduced ER/PR expression after CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance was additionally observed in tumor biopsy specimens from patients treated with these drugs. Alternative mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors such as loss of pRb and Cyclin E1 overexpression also exhibited decreased hormone responsiveness suggesting that the clinical paradigm of sequential endocrine-based therapy may be ineffective in some settings of acquired CDK4/6 resistance.

#3037 Background: Recently, a 36 kDa variant of estrogen receptor a (ER-a66), ER-a36, has been identified and cloned. ER-a36 predominantly localizes on the plasma membrane and in the cytoplasm and mediates a membrane-initiated “nongenomic” signaling pathway. In this study, we investigated the association between ER-a36 expression and tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer patients.
 Methods: ER-a36 protein expression in tumors from 710 breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 7.9 years was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox model. All statistical tests were two-sided.
 Results: Among the patients with ER-a66 positive tumors who received tamoxifen treatment (n=307), overexpression of ER-a36 was associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) and remained as an unfavorable independent factor of survival in multivariate analyses (DFS: HR=2.27; 95% CI= 1.40 to 3.68; P=. 001; DSS: HR=2.42; 95% CI= 1.37 to 4.28; P= .002). In contrast, among patients with ER-a66 positive tumors who did not receive tamoxifen (n=129), ER-a36 expression was not associated with survival, indicating a correlation between ER-a36 expression and tamoxifen resistance. Furthermore, ER-a36 expression was not associated with survival in ER-a66 negative tumors whether the patients received tamoxifen (n=73) or not (n=149). Our in vitro experiments with MCF7/ER36 cells also confirmed that high ER-a36 expression resulted in tamoxifen resistance.
 Conclusions: Patients with ER-a66 positive tumors that also express high levels of ER-a36 are less likely to benefit from tamoxifen treatment. ER-a36 is an important predictive marker for tamoxifen therapy in ER-a66 positive breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 3037.