No abstract

Background: Treatment modalities of odontogenic cystic lesions of the jaws range from conservative to radical. “Dredging” may be considered the “middle path” between conservative and radical treatment options. It comprises three entities—decompression, followed by repeated scraping of the lesion, and finally, peripheral ostectomy providing margin clearance but without significant morbidity. Aim: To evaluate the outcome of “dredging” in the management of large cystic lesions of the jaws, without major resections and maintaining normal functions. Methodology: This prospective study was conducted on 30 patients. Inclusion criteria were odontogenic cystic lesions at least 2 cm in size either in the proximity of vital structures or in children with developing tooth germs or so large that upon enucleation, can result in pathological fracture. All underwent decompression followed by dredging performed at every 2 to 3 months intervals. Results: Drastic decrease in size of the lesion as measured on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and new bone formation was evident in all patients. The total Reduction Rate (RR) of the cystic lesions was 88.79% in 9.2 months. RR was highest in Calcifying epithelial odontogenic cyst (CEOC) followed by Unicystic Ameloblastoma (UA), Odontogenic Keratocysts (OKC), Dentigerous cyst (DC), and Radicular Cyst (RC) in CBCT. The mean speed of shrinkage was fastest in CEOC, followed by OKC, UA, RC, and DC after dredging. Shrinkage was higher in patients below 20 years of age (P 0.012) and patients with large cystic lesions (P 0.00447). Conclusion: The results suggest that dredging with regular, long-term follow-up can be a successful treatment method for large cystic lesions in young adults. This method includes the benefits of both conservative and radical treatment methods but lacks the disadvantages of either.

No abstract

Background: The principal transfacial routes described to approach condylar process fractures are preauricular, retromandibular, high submandibular, and their various modifications. The selection of a specific surgical approach mainly depends on the level of condylar fracture, displacement/dislocation of the proximal segment and time elapsed from the date of trauma. Not too many studies proclaim a unanimous consensus on “gold standard” approaches for particular levels of fracture. Aim: This study was conducted with the aim to lay down guidelines for determining the ideal surgical approach for treating different condylar fractures based on different clinical situations. Methodology: This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation of condylar fractures according to preset study design. Inclusion criteria were fracture displacement more than 10 degrees, dislocation, shortening of ramal height more than 2 mm. Patients having maxillofacial fractures other than mandible and condylar fractures in edentulous patients were excluded from this study. Results: The risk of facial nerve injury was more in endaural group and parotid fistula was more evident in retromandibular subparotid group but there was no statistical difference between the groups. The surgical scar was inconspicuous in all three groups. Excellent results were achieved in the other parameters such as mouth opening, range of motion, bite force, and occlusion with all the three approaches. Postoperative CT scan showed satisfactory anatomical reduction. Conclusion: This study concludes that the decision-making on the approach to be selected for any particular condylar fracture depends on the level of fracture, presence of fracture dislocation, and time elapsed from the date of trauma.

No abstract