No abstract

IntroductionMetaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare malignancy that accounts for < 1% of all breast cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of MBC patients treated at a tertiary cancer center. Materials and methodsIn this study, the authors retrospectively analyzed the prospectively maintained data of MBC patients treated at a tertiary cancer care center in North India between January 2019 and July 2022. ResultsA total of 28 MBCs were identified. The median age of presentation was 47 years (range 27-81 years). Seventeen patients (60.7%) presented with clinical T3/T4 disease, and axillary nodal involvement was detected in 11 patients (39.3%) at presentation. Two patients had metastatic disease at presentation. A preoperative diagnosis of MBC on core biopsy was attained in five patients (17.9%), and the most common histologic subtype was sarcomatoid carcinoma. Triple-negative receptor status was observed in 15 patients (53.6%). Six patients (21.4%) underwent upfront breast conservation surgery and another six (21.4%) upfront mastectomy. Thirteen patients (46.4%) underwent mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy. Definitive axillary nodal metastasis was found in eight patients (32%). Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, five patients (35.7%) had stable disease, disease progression was evident in five patients (35.7%), partial response in four patients (28.6%), and no patient evinced complete response. Adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy was administered in 16 patients (57.1%). At a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range 4-26 months), 16 patients (57.1%) were alive with no evidence of disease, one patient (3.6%) was alive with disease, nine patients (32.1%) died of disease, and two patients (7.2%) died of other causes. One patient suffered from locoregional recurrence and nine patients developed distant metastasis. ConclusionMBC is an infrequent entity among breast carcinomas in India, which is similar to the reports of MBC worldwide. The diagnosis of MBC is difficult and requires the use of immunohistochemistry. Most of the cases in our study presented with a larger tumor size; however, they displayed a relatively lower incidence of nodal involvement as well as hormone receptor negativity. Being a rare and heterogeneous disease, largescale studies are essential for better understanding and management of these tumors.

Introduction: Pancytopenia is a hematological condition in which there is a reduction in all three cell lines of blood. This study aims to evaluate the utility of reticulocyte indices such as reticulocyte % (retic %), immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), and mean reticulocyte volume (MRV) in identifying the cause of pancytopenia. Materials and Methods: Reticulocyte indices were measured by an automated coulter. These values were then correlated with relevant biochemical and bone marrow results and cases were stratified into different etiological groups. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed and various cut-off values were derived based on the reticulocyte indices. ROC was repeated to further classify cut-off values at every level to help formulate a diagnostic algorithm. Results: A total of 154 cases of pancytopenia were obtained. Ages ranged from 7 months to 87 years with a mean of 42, the male:female ratio was 1.08:1. The majority of the cases were megaloblastic anemias in which the cut-off values for retic % was <0.91 with a sensitivity of 78.1% and specificity of 70%, IRF was 0.45 with a sensitivity of 76.7% and specificity of 64%, and MRV was >121.8 fl with a sensitivity of 83.6% and specificity of 80%. The values on ROC could segregate nutritional from nonnutritional causes. The IRF and MRV also helped to differentiate megaloblastic anemia from dual deficiency anemia. Conclusion: Reticulocyte indices help identify the cause of pancytopenia. They can segregate nutritional anemia from other causes of pancytopenia allowing presumptive treatment to be initiated and may obviate invasive procedures such as bone marrow examination.

Common presentation of primary gallbladder carcinoma is with abdominal pain, or it may be detected incidentally in postcholecystectomy specimen for cholelithiasis. Primary gallbladder carcinoma spreads to adjacent hepatic parenchyma and locoregional nodes. Lung is a common extra-abdominal site, with other sites being relatively rare. We report a case of primary gallbladder carcinoma, which presented with elbow swelling in the absence of locoregional nodal spread detected on whole-body 18F-FDG PET/contrast-enhanced CT at initial evaluation.

Background Lymphocytic infiltrates of the major salivary glands are involved in a spectrum of diseases that range from reactive to benign and malignant neoplasms. Occasionally, these pathologic entities present difficulties in the clinical and pathological diagnosis. Aim and Objective The aim of this study was to highlight the importance of meticulous cytopathological and histopathological examination (HPE) in solving the diagnostic challenges encountered in the analysis of these salivary gland lesions. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of salivary gland lesions was undertaken over a period of 5 years from 2013 to 2018 in the Department of Pathology at our institute. Salivary gland pathologies diagnosed either as chronic sialadenitis or reactive/benign/malignant lymphoepithelial lesions on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and as lymphoepithelial carcinoma (LEC) were included in this study. Results A total of 86 cases of salivary gland lesions diagnosed as mentioned above were found during this period. Out of the 86 cases, 16 were subjected to HPE. Biopsy was not warranted in most of the cases diagnosed as chronic sialadenitis. HPE was concordant with the FNAC diagnoses in 13 out of the 16 cases (81.3%), with a single case misinterpreted as LEC on FNAC. Conclusion Benign and malignant lymphoepithelial lesions of salivary glands may sometimes be difficult to differentiate not only from one another on FNAC but also from other malignant lesions. FNAC is an effective tool for the diagnosis of nonneoplastic lesions, but in cases of benign lymphoepithelial lesions in the absence of salivary acini, biopsy is advisable.