Context: More than half of all spinal cord injuries (SCI) occur at the cervical level leading to loss of upper limb function, restricted activity and reduced independence. Several technologies have been developed to assist with upper limb functions in the SCI population. Objective: There is no clear clinical consensus on the effectiveness of the current assistive technologies for the cervical SCI population, hence this study reviews the literature in the years between 1999 and 2019. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the state-of-the-art assistive technology that supports and improves the function of impaired upper limbs in cervical SCI populations. Combinations of terms, covering assistive technology, SCI, and upper limb, were used in the search, which resulted in a total of 1770 articles. Data extractions were performed on the selected studies which involved summarizing details on the assistive technologies, characteristics of study participants, outcome measures, and improved upper limb functions when using the device. Results: A total of 24 articles were found and grouped into five categories, including neuroprostheses (invasive and non-invasive), orthotic devices, hybrid systems, robots, and arm supports. Only a few selected studies comprehensively reported characteristics of the participants. There was a wide range of outcome measures and all studies reported improvements in upper limb function with the devices. Conclusions: This study highlighted that assistive technologies can improve functions of the upper limbs in SCI patients. It was challenging to draw generalizable conclusions because of factors, such as heterogeneity of recruited participants, a wide range of outcome measures, and the different technologies employed.

No abstract

AimsPerson-Centred Care (PCC) focuses on knowing the person behind the patient, engaging them as an active partner in their treatment, encouraging self-management and shared decisions. Inpatient multidisciplinary (MDT) clinics offer an opportunity for PCC by working collaboratively with service users (SU) in developing care plans. The aims of this project were to explore staff views and levels of satisfaction regarding the running of MDT clinics, to assess the quality and efficacy of changes made to MDT clinics, and to identify areas of practice which need improvement.MethodsIn April 2021, MDT meetings of an acute inpatient clinical team were repurposed to 30-minute clinics with SU and relevant key professionals present, focusing on SU needs. Two staff surveys were completed in June and October 2021. Following the first survey, changes were made to the days clinics were run, attendance schedule, and staff allocation of responsibilities for efficient clinic running. In the second survey, a 14-question questionnaire was sent to all 48 staff members. The questions explored staff experience of MDT clinics. The measures were both qualitative and quantitative.ResultsThe overall response rate was 31.25%, of which 40% by medical and 40% by nursing staff. Staff reported there was a positive impact in the collaborative development of care plans, including improved SU involvement, increased involvement of families, improved contribution from different professionals, and formulations providing greater insight. They reported improved task orientation, directed responsibility for task completion within the team, and enhanced role and responsibility of the named nurse. They thought there was less time for 1:1 work, but that the “overall benefits are worth it”. Improved relationship with SU was reported by 85%, increased engagement with SU care by 93%, and identifying clear goals for care plans by 93%. Nevertheless, problems with planning and logistics were reported by 77%. Main challenges included time management especially with external visitors or combination of remote and face-to-face attendees, relatively poor attendance of CMHT and family members, difficulties with informing and preparing SU ahead of their clinic times, number of attendees, and dissemination of MDT care plans.ConclusionRepurposing MDT meetings to MDT clinics focusing on SU needs has a positive impact in inpatient clinical practice. MDT clinic planning and improving the involvement of community teams and family members can contribute to an optimal purposeful inpatient admission. Conducting inpatient MDT clinics can be a crucial part of working collaboratively with SU and PCC.

No abstract

No abstract