The diagnostics of inner ear diseases are primarily functional, but there is a growing interest in inner ear biomarkers. The present scoping review aimed to elucidate gaps in the literature regarding the definition, classification system, and an overview of the potential uses of inner ear biomarkers. Relevant biomarkers were categorized, and their possible benefits were evaluated. The databases OVID Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO COINAHL, CA PLUS, WOS BIOSIS, WOS Core Collection, Proquest Dissertations, Theses Global, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, and BASE were searched using the keywords “biomarker” and “inner ear”. Of the initially identified 1502 studies, 34 met the inclusion criteria. The identified biomarkers were classified into diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic, and pathognomonic; many were detected only in the inner ear or temporal bone. The inner-ear-specific biomarkers detected in peripheral blood included otolin-1, prestin, and matrilin-1. Various serum antibodies correlated with inner ear diseases (e.g., anti-type II collagen, antinuclear antibodies, antibodies against cytomegalovirus). Further studies are advised to elucidate the clinical significance and diagnostic or prognostic usage of peripheral biomarkers for inner ear disorders, filling in the literature gaps with biomarkers pertinent to the otology clinical practice and integrating functional and molecular biomarkers. These may be the building blocks toward a well-structured guideline for diagnosing and managing some audio-vestibular disorders.

No abstract

ObjectiveTo systematically search the literature and organize relevant advancements in the connection between tinnitus and the activity of different functional brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Data SourcesMEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PROSPERO from inception to April 2022.Review MethodsStudies with adult human subjects who suffer from tinnitus and underwent fMRI to relate specific regions of interest to tinnitus pathology or compensation were included. In addition, fMRI had to be performed with a paradigm of stimuli that would stimulate auditory brain activity. Exclusion criteria included non‐English studies, animal studies, and studies that utilized a resting state magnetic resonance imaging or other imaging modalities.ResultsThe auditory cortex may work to dampen the effects of central gain. Results from different studies show variable changes in the Heschl's gyrus (HG), with some showing increased activity and others showing inhibition and volume loss. After controlling for hyperacusis and other confounders, tinnitus does not seem to influence the inferior colliculus (IC) activation. However, there is decreased connectivity between the auditory cortex and IC. The cochlear nucleus (CN) generally shows increased activation in tinnitus patients. fMRI evidence indicates significant inhibition of thalamic gating. Activating the thalamus may be of important therapeutic potential.ConclusionPatients with tinnitus have significantly altered neuronal firing patterns, especially within the auditory network, when compared to individuals without tinnitus. Tinnitus and hyperacusis commonly coexist, making differentiation of the effects of these 2 phenomena frequently difficult.