Introduction Effectiveness of flipped learning in clinical education is unknown. This study evaluates the effectiveness of remote case‐based learning for teaching clinical treatment planning compared with traditional in‐person clinical experience. Materials and Methods Four cases containing medical and dental charts were discussed through flipped learning with faculty panel during the COVID‐19 lockdown. Prior to each session, students worked individually or in groups to complete assignments with leading questions. After the final assignment, students completed a survey to rate the learning experience from each case, compare the remote experience with the previous in‐person clinical experience and provide suggestions to improve remote clinical instruction in the future. Students’ performance measured by the number of case assessments and competencies completed post‐lockdown was compared with pre‐lockdown and the previous year using odd ratio (OR), Chi‐squared test (χ2) and significant level p < .05. Results A total of 106 students completed the course, and 99 students completed all survey questions. Students reported positive learning experiences (overall mean = 7.84, SD = 1.11). Post‐lockdown, statistically significant increase in the proportions of total passed attempts (χ2 p = .002, OR = 2.23), competencies (χ2 p = .028, OR = 2.05) and case assessments (χ2 p = .004, OR = 2.73) was observed between the current class and the previous pre‐COVID‐19 class (108 students). Post‐lockdown, students also passed significantly more attempts (χ2 p < .0001), competencies (χ2 p < .0001) and case assessments (χ2 p = .008) compared with pre‐lockdown. Conclusions Although a flipped classroom does not replace in‐person clinical experience, teaching clinical treatment planning remotely improved students’ readiness and clinical performance through collaborative learning, practice and case exposure.

No abstract

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is radiopaque. This in vitro study compares the changes in the radiopacity of carious lesions after SDF application, potassium iodide (PI) application, and water rinse. Ten recently extracted human teeth were sectioned and divided into two groups (n = 10 in each group): Group 1 = SDF, Group 2 = SDF + PI. Teeth in Group 1 received SDF for 1 min and rinsed with 15 mL water. Group 2 received the same protocol with the addition of PI application for 1 min after SDF application. All samples were scanned with micro-computed tomography before SDF application, after SDF application, after PI application (group 2) and after water rinse. The radiopacity of the carious lesions increased significantly after SDF application in Group 1 and 2 (p < 0.017, p < 0.008, respectively). A significant increase in radiopacity after PI application was also observed in Group 2 (p < 0.008). Water rinsing significantly decreased the radiopacity in Group 1 and 2 (p < 0.017, p < 0.008, respectively), but the radiopacity remained significantly higher than the preoperative values (Group 1 p < 0.017, Group 2 p < 0.008). The radiopacity of carious lesions increases after SDF and SDF + PI applications. Water rinsing could reduce the radiopacity of SDF and SDF + PI treated carious lesions, and might reduce the content of SDF in carious lesions.

Background: Restoring bonding composite to silver diamine fluoride (SDF)-treated enamel is challenging. This study investigates if phosphoric acid etch restores composite bond strength to SDF-treated enamel using universal adhesives. Methods: Twenty-four recently extracted permanent teeth were randomly divided into 4 (2 experimental (SDF) and 2 control (CTR)) groups: SDF+Water: SDF (1 min) then water rinse (15 mL); CTR+Water: no treatment and water rinse (15 mL); SDF+Etch+Water: SDF (1 min), 35% phosphoric acid (40 s) then water rinse (15 mL); CTR+Etch+Water no treatment, 35% phosphoric acid (40 s) then water rinse (15 mL). The enamel surface in all the groups was bonded (All-Bond Universal) to 4–5 mm composite blocks (Z-250). Each sample was sectioned, and 6–8 beams (1 mm × 1 mm) were selected. The micro-tensile bond strength was measured by dividing the micro-tensile force peak by the adhesive surface area. Univariate ANOVA and Chi-square were used for between-group comparisons with p < 0.05. Results: SDF+Water had significantly lower tensile strength compared to all the groups (p < 0.05). Although no difference was found in the tensile strength between the SDF+Etch+Water and the CTR+Etch+Water, the SDF+Etch+Water had significantly more adhesive failures compared to the CTR+Etch+Water (p = 0.047). Conclusions: While phosphoric acid etch seems to restore the initial composite bond strength to SDF-treated enamel, the long-term success of composite restorations bonded to SDF-treated enamel may need further investigation.