Objective To identify the taste and smell impairment in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–positive subjects and compare the findings with COVID-19–negative subjects using the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Anosmia Reporting Tool. Setting Tertiary referral center/COVID-19 pandemic hospital. Study Design Comparative study. Subjects and Methods After power analysis, 128 subjects were divided into 2 groups according to real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) COVID-19 testing results. Subjects were called via telephone, and the AAO-HNS Anosmia Reporting Tool was used to collect responses. Results The mean age of the study group was 38.63 ± 10.08 years. At the time of sampling, rhinorrhea was significantly high in the COVID-19–negative group, whereas those complaints described as “other” were significantly high in the COVID-19–positive group. There was a significant difference in the smell/taste impairment rates of the groups (n = 46% [71.9%] for the COVID-19–positive group vs n = 17 [26.6%] for the COVID-19–negative group, P = .001). For subjects with a smell impairment, anosmia rates did not differ between the groups. The rates of hyposmia and parosmia were significantly high in the COVID-19–positive group. For the subjects with taste impairment, ageusia rates did not differ between groups. The rate of hypogeusia and dysgeusia was significantly high in the COVID-19–positive group. Logistic regression analysis indicates that smell/taste impairment in COVID-19–positive subjects increases the odds ratio by 6.956 (95% CI, 3.16-15.29) times. Conclusion COVID-19–positive subjects are strongly associated with smell/taste impairment.
The subjective symptoms of sleep apnea syndrome seem to be closely related to oxygen desaturations. Hypoxia during apnea periods of OSA is important; therefore, we suggest that ODI is as valuable as AHI in diagnosing and grading the OSAS.
Nasopharyngeal exposure to experimental reflux alters the ET mucosa histopathology, which suggests that gastroesophageal reflux has a role in ET dysfunction.
TORS BOT, epiglottoplasty, and multilevel procedures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome can be regarded as feasible, safe, and effective technique.
Chronic nonspecific pharyngitis is one of the most common reasons for visits to otorhinolaryngology physicians. The underlying conditions are still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux in chronic nonspecific pharyngitis patients based on the patient's history and clinical examination. Fifty consecutive patients with symptoms of chronic nonspecific pharyngitis and control group of 30 healthy persons were evaluated prospectively. 14C-urea breath test was used to exclude Helicobacter pylori infection of gastric mucosa. All the patients and the controls were assessed by blinded same laryngologist with the use of the reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptoms index (RSI). Also chronic nonspecific pharyngitis patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) were evaluated prospectively before and 6 months after b.i.d treatment with proton pump inhibitors. The RSI of the nonspecific pharyngitis group was found significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.01). The RFS of nonspecific pharyngitis was found significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.01). The reflux finding score > or =7 has been accepted as LPR; the reflux incidence was significantly higher in the nonspecific pharyngitis group than the control group (P < 0.01). Posttreatment RSI of nonspecific pharyngitis patients group revealed a statistically significant decrease when compared with the pretreatment RSI (P < 0.01). Posttreatment RFS of nonspecific pharyngitis patients also revealed a significant decrease when compared with the pretreatment RFS (P < 0.01). We suggest that LPR may be related to the pathogenesis of chronic nonspecific pharyngitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.