PurposeTo analyze the optimum organ filling point for organs at risk (OARs) dose in cervical cancer high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.Material and methodsIn a retrospective study, 32 locally advanced cervical cancer patients (97 insertions) who were treated with 3D conformal external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy during 2010-2013 were included. Rotterdam HDR tandem-ovoid applicators were used and computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed after each insertion. The OARs delineation and GEC-ESTRO-based clinical target volumes (CTVs) contouring was followed by 3D forward planning. Then, dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters of organs were recorded and patients were classified based on their OARs volumes, as well as their inserted tandem length.ResultsThe absorbed dose to point A ranged between 6.5-7.5 Gy. D0.1cm3 and D2cm3 of the bladder significantly increased with the bladder volume enlargement (p value < 0.05). By increasing the bladder volume up to about 140 cm3, the rectum dose was also increased. For the cases with bladder volumes higher than 140 cm3, the rectum dose decreased. For bladder volumes lower than 75 cm3, the sigmoid dose decreased; however, for bladder volumes higher than 75 cm3, the sigmoid dose increased. The D2cm3 of the bladder and rectum were higher for longer tandems than for shorter ones, respectively. The divergence of the obtained results for different tandem lengths became wider by the extension of the bladder volume. The rectum and sigmoid volume had a direct impact on increasing their D0.1cm3 and D2cm3, as well as decreasing their D10, D30, and D50.ConclusionsThere is a relationship between the volumes of OARs and their received doses. Selecting a bladder with a volume of about 70 cm3 or less proved to be better with regards to the dose to the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and vision-threatening complications of brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 ( 106 Ru) plaque to treat uveal melanoma.Material and methods: A literature review was performed based on results from searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, using the following key words: "choroidal melanoma", "uveal melanoma", "brachytherapy", and "ruthenium-106". We included studies performed on more than 30 patients since 1986, reporting on local control rate, complications rate, mean radiation dose, and mean tumor thickness. The cumulative analysis was performed using Metaprop command of Stata v.16, and meta-regression was conducted based on mean tumor thickness and mean radiation dose to tumor's apex.Results: Twenty-one retrospective studies were selected, involving 3,913 patients treated primarily with 106 Ru plaque brachytherapy. The range of radiation dose to tumor apex was from 70 Gy to 250 Gy. The local control rate following brachytherapy ranged from 59% to 98%, and the overall weighted mean of local control was 84%. However, the heterogeneity between studies' reports was remarkable (I 2 = 95.40%). Meta-regression based on tumor thickness and mean dose of radiation to the apex showed that the studies' heterogeneity was minimally related to the difference in mean tumor size (I 2 = 92%). The correlation between larger tumor size and lower local control rate was statistically significant (p-value = 0.024). There was no significant correlation between the mean radiation dose and local control rate (p-value = 0.679). The most commonly reported complications were cataract and radiation-related retinopathy.Conclusions: Although the studies' heterogeneity was high, in a prescription dose ranging from 70 Gy to 250 Gy to the tumor apex, 106 Ru brachytherapy seems to be successful in local control of uveal melanoma. The efficacy of 106 Ru in controlling uveal melanomas decreased with the increase in tumor thickness. However, these outcomes should be verified in randomized comparative studies.

Purpose Today, the rapid outbreak of COVID-19 is the leading health issue. Patients with cancer are at high risk for the development of morbidities of COVID-19. Hence, oncology centers need to provide organ-based recommendations for optimal management of cancer in the COVID-19 era. Methods In this article, we have provided the recommendations on management of locally advanced rectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic based on our experience in Shohada-e Tajrish Hospital, Iran. Results We recommend that patients with locally advanced rectal cancer should be managed in an individualized manner in combination with local conditions related to COVID-19. Conclusion Our recommendation may provide a guide for oncology centers of developing countries for better management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Treatment management of cancer patients in the radiation oncology departments during the current COVID-19 pandemic is challenging. A systematic review of published consensus/guidelines on the role of radiotherapy prioritization, suggested treatment protocols, and set up management was undertaken based on the PRISMA protocol and through PubMed/PMC, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science databases until 01/20/2021. One hundred and sixty-eight publications or regional consensus were included. Summary of recommendations contained: (1) using hypo-fractionated (Hypo-F) regimens for therapeutic/palliative indications, (2) delaying radiotherapy for several weeks or until pandemic over, (3) omitting radiotherapy by replacement of alternative therapies or active surveillance, (4) applying safer patients' setup and preparation protocols, (5) developing telemedicine/telehealth service. To conclude, it is essential to carefully weigh the risk of exposure to COVID-19 infection and the benefit of treating cancer patients during the pandemic. Trying to have a global guideline facing this or any other probable crisis is crucial for health care service.

PurposeThis study was designed to assess the dose accumulation (DA) of bladder and rectum between brachytherapy fractions using hybrid-based deformable image registration (DIR) and compare it with the simple summation (SS) approach of GEC-ESTRO in cervical cancer patients.Material and methodsPatients (n = 137) with cervical cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy and three fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy were selected. CT images were acquired to delineate organs at risk and targets according to GEC-ESTRO recommendations. In order to determine the DA for the bladder and rectum, hybrid-based DIR was done for three different fractions of brachytherapy and the results were compared with the standard GEC-ESTRO method. Also, we performed a phantom study to calculate the uncertainty of the hybrid-based DIR algorithm for contour matching and dose mapping.ResultsThe mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the Dice similarity coefficient (DICE), Jaccard, Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) in the DIR process were 0.94 ±0.02, 0.89 ±0.03, 8.44 ±3.56 and 0.72 ±0.22 for bladder and 0.89 ±0.05, 0.80 ±0.07, 15.46 ±10.14 and 1.19 ±0.59 for rectum, respectively. The median (Q1, Q3; maximum) GyEQD2 differences of total D2cc between DIR-based and SS methods for the bladder and rectum were reduced by –1.53 (–0.86, –2.98; –9.17) and –1.38 (–0.80, –2.14; –7.11), respectively. The mean ± SD of DICE, Jaccard, HD, and MDA for contour matching were 0.98 ±0.008, 0.97 ±0.01, 2.00 ±0.70 and 0.20 ±0.04, respectively for large deformation. Maximum uncertainty of dose mapping was about 3.58%.ConclusionsThe hybrid-based DIR algorithm demonstrated low registration uncertainty for both contour matching and dose mapping. The DA difference between DIR-based and SS approaches was statistically significant for both bladder and rectum and hybrid-based DIR showed potential to assess DA between brachytherapy fractions.