Malakoplakia is an inflammatory process related to defective macrophage response to bacterial infection. To further characterize the clinicopathologic manifestations of gastrointestinal malakoplakia, 26 cases were identified from 6 institutions. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and available stains were reviewed, and pertinent clinicopathologic features analyzed. Sixteen patients were women (62%). Mean patient age was 64 (range: 24 to 83). Sites included the colorectum (n=23), appendix (n=1), and stomach (n=2). Clinical indications for tissue procurement included screening (n=14), tumor resection (n=5), diarrhea (n=1), adenoma surveillance (n=1), ulcerative colitis flare (n=1), abdominal pain (n=1), and appendicitis (1). All cases featured histiocytes with abundant, pale, eosinophilic cytoplasm focally containing Michaelis-Gutmann bodies. The process frequently involved the mucosa (n=19), with architectural distortion in 13 cases. Lymphoid aggregates were present in 18 cases, which were prominent or obscuring in 11 (all colon biopsies) and provoked concern for lymphoma in 2. Associated findings included adenocarcinoma (n=5), adenoma (n=2), gastric hyperplastic polyps (n=1), chemical gastritis (n=1), collagenous colitis (n=1), and active chronic colitis (n=2). In cases with available stains, Michaelis-Gutman bodies were highlighted by Periodic Acid-Schiff with diastase, Von Kossa, and iron stains. Although 2 cases were positive for Tropheryma whipplei antibody, no T. whipplei transcripts were detected on real-time polymerase chain reaction. All patients with available follow-up are alive and well with no additional instances of malakoplakia. Malakoplakia of the gastrointestinal tract is a benign, incidental finding. Although histologic features in the stomach and colon resections are similar to those at other sites, exuberant lymphocytic response in colon biopsies and immunoreactivity with T. whippleii antibody may provoke initial confusion and lead to unnecessary time and resource investment.

No abstract

BackgroundPrimary gastric actinomycosis is extremely rare, the appendix and ileocecal region being the most commonly involved sites in abdominopelvic actinomycosis. Herein, we report a case of primary gastric actinomycosis. The diagnosis was made on microscopic evaluation of gastroscopic biopsy specimens. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third case to be reported in the literature, in which the diagnosis was made in a gastroscopic biopsy rather than a resection specimen.Case presentationAn 87-year-old Saudi male on medication for cardiomyopathy, premature ventricular contractions, renal impairment, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, presented to the emergency department with acute diffuse abdominal pain, abdominal distension, constipation and vomiting for two days, with no history of fever, abdominal surgery or trauma. The patient was admitted to the hospital with an impression of gastric outlet obstruction. Based on radiologic and gastroscopic findings, a non-infectious etiology was suspected, possibly adenocarcinoma or lymphoma. Gastroscopic biopsies showed an actively inflamed, focally ulcerated atrophic fundic mucosa along with fragments of a fibrinopurulent exudate containing brownish, iron negative pigment and abundant filamentous bacteria, morphologically consistent with Actinomyces.ConclusionAlthuogh extremely rare, primary gastric actinomycosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of radiologic and gastroscopic diffuse gastric wall thickening and submucosal tumor-like or infiltrative lesions, particularly in patients with history of abdominal surgery or trauma, or those receiving extensive medication. A high level of suspicion is required by the pathologist to achieve diagnosis in gastroscopic biopsies. Subtle changes such as the presence of a pigmented inflammatory exudate should alert the pathologist to perform appropriate special stains to reveal the causative organism.

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytic proliferation that occurs in nodal and extranodal sites. Rare examples of the disease involving the digestive system have been described. To characterize the digestive tract manifestations of this disease, 12 specimens from 11 patients with extranodal RDD affecting the digestive organs were analyzed. Hematoxylin and eosin sections and available immunohistochemical stains were reviewed, and the clinical information was obtained from patients’ electronic or submitted records. Eight patients were female and 3 male (median age, 65 y; range, 17 to 76 y). Abdominal pain was the most frequent symptom. Six patients had an associated immunologic or malignant disease. Nine lesions arose in the gastrointestinal tract (1 involving the appendix, 2 right colon, 6 left colon), 2 in the pancreas, and 1 in the liver. Two patients had the coexistent nodal disease, and 1 had bone and soft-tissue involvement. The lesions were generally composed of polygonal to spindle-shaped histiocytes with eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm admixed with lymphoplasmacytic cells. The inflammatory cells formed lymphoid aggregates in 7 cases and included focally scattered or small collections of neutrophils in 6 cases. Fibrosis was variable, and 4 cases had a storiform pattern. Vasculopathy in the form of a thickened capillary wall, medium-sized arterial wall infiltration by lesional and inflammatory cells and phlebitis was seen in 10, 5, and 2 cases, respectively. All cases were reactive for S100-protein. Of the 5 patients with follow-up, 1 developed immunoglobulin A nephropathy and died of renal failure.