No abstract

Objectives i) To prospectively explore patients' experience through the two-week wait (2WW) referral process; ii) To compare the relative true malignancy diagnostic rate between general medical practitioners (GMPs) and general dental practitioners (GDPs) over a six-month period; iii) To compare management of 2WW referral cases between GMPs and GDPs before the referral and during the 2 weeks in regards to symptomatic support, investigations in primary care, and information communicated to patients and secondary care clinicians; iv) To investigate the benign conditions that comprise 2WW referrals by finding out the final diagnoses of all cases included in the study.Method The patient inclusion criteria were all 2WW referral patients who attended consultation clinics during the six-month study period in Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust. We prospectively distributed patient questionnaires and clinician's referral assessment forms. We obtained the final diagnoses of all participants electronically, and also identified all malignancies diagnosed via routine referral route during the study period from the cancer services team.Results Two hundred and twenty patients referred via 2WW pathway participated in the study. Of these, 148 referrals were from GMPs and 72 from GDPs. The overall malignancy diagnostic yield was 6.2%; markedly higher from GMPs (9.5%) than GDPs (1.4%), and higher number than those from routine pathway. The GMPs and GDPs showed similar levels of clinical management and information exchange judging from the participants' responses. We also identified the top nine most commonly urgently referred benign conditions.Conclusion We reiterate the need for improved communication between clinicians and patients and between clinicians. We also suggest more focus on education in commonly encountered conditions as well as malignant lesions. The number of 2WW referrals we received from GMPs was nearly twice as many as those from GDPs, highlighting the importance of delivering oral medicine education to medical students, trainees and GMPs.

The clinical presentations of oral malignancy are diverse. This short article discusses a case of a late-presenting oral malignancy and signifies the importance of general dental and medical practitioners’ knowledge in the diagnosis of oral malignancy. Clinical relevance: Oral malignancy is a life-threatening diagnosis. The importance of a structured systematic approach in the diagnosis is discussed.

No abstract

No abstract