BackgroundIt has been reported that ING3 inhibits the progression of various cancers. However, some studies have shown that it promotes the development of prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether ING3 expression is associated with the prognosis of patients with cancer.Materials and methodsPubMed, Cochrane Database, Embase, Medline, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until September 2022. The hazard ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using Stata 17 software. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess the risk of bias.ResultSeven studies involving 2371 patients with five types of cancer were included. The results showed that high expression of ING3 was negatively associated with a more advanced TNM stage (III-IV vs. I-II) (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86), lymph node metastasis (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.90) and disease-free survival (HR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.37-0.88). However, ING3 expression was not associated with overall survival (HR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.41-1.12), tumor size (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.33-1.37), tumor differentiation (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.36-2.09) and gender (OR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.78-1.66).ConclusionThis study showed that the expression of ING3 was associated with better prognosis, suggesting that ING3 may be a potential biomarker for cancer prognosis.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42022306354).

Background The relationship between serum lipids and cholecystitis is still under investigation. To examine the causal effect of serum lipids on cholecystitis using the Mendelian randomization method. Methods We conducted univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using summary statistics from two independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on serum lipids (n = 132,908) and cholecystitis (n = 361,194). Mainly, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized to combine each SNP’s causal estimation, and the MR-Egger was adopted as a complementary method, together with the weighted median. Cochrane’s Q value was employed to appraise heterogeneity. The MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO were used to detect the horizontal pleiotropy. Results Our univariable results displayed a minor protective effect of serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (OR [95% CI] = 0.9984483 [0.9984499, 0.9984468]; p = 0.008) on cholecystitis. No significant causal effect of total cholesterol (TC) (OR [95% CI] = 0.9994228 [0.9994222, 0.9994233]; p = 0.296), triglycerides (OR [95% CI] = 0.9990893 [0.9990882, 0.9990903]; p = 0.238) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (OR [95% CI] = 0.9997020 [0.9997017, 0.9997023]; p = 0.565) was found on cholecystitis. Conclusion These findings suggest that LDL cholesterolhas a slight protective effect on cholecystitis, which can be easily affected by confounding factors. TC, triglycerides and HDL cholesterol don’t have causal effect on cholecystitis. The protective effect of serum lipids on cholecystitis, though possible, remain less certain.