BackgroundAlthough several key molecules have been identified to modulate SARS-CoV-2 invasion of human host cells, the molecules correlated with outcomes in COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection remain insufficiently explored.MethodsThis study analyzed three RNA-Seq gene expression profiling datasets for COVID-19 and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between COVID-19 patients and normal people, commonly in the three datasets. Furthermore, this study explored the correlation between the expression of these genes and clinical features in COVID-19 patients.ResultsThis analysis identified 13 genes significantly upregulated in COVID-19 patients’ leukocyte and SARS-CoV-2-infected nasopharyngeal tissue compared to normal tissue. These genes included OAS1, OAS2, OAS3, OASL, HERC6, SERPING1, IFI6, IFI44, IFI44L, CMPK2, RSAD2, EPSTI1, and CXCL10, all of which are involved in antiviral immune regulation. We found that these genes’ downregulation was associated with worse clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients, such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilatory support (MVS) requirement, elevated D-dimer levels, and increased viral loads. Furthermore, this analysis identified two COVID-19 clusters based on the expression profiles of the 13 genes, termed COV-C1 and COV-C2. Compared with COV-C1, COV-C2 more highly expressed the 13 genes, had stronger antiviral immune responses, were younger, and displayed more favorable clinical outcomes.ConclusionsA strong antiviral immune response is essential in reducing severity of COVID-19.

Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cancer are common age-related diseases, and epidemiological evidence suggests an inverse relationship between them. However, investigating the potential mechanism underlying their relationship remains insufficient. Methods Based on genome-wide association summary statistics for 42,034 AD patients and 609,951 cancer patients from the GWAS Catalog using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) method. Moreover, we utilized two-step MR to identify metabolites mediating between AD and cancer. Furthermore, we employed colocalization analysis to identify genes whose upregulation is a risk factor for AD and demonstrated the genes’ upregulation to be a favorable prognostic factor for cancer by analyzing transcriptomic data for 33 TCGA cancer types. Results Two-sample MR analysis revealed a significant causal influence for increased AD risk on reduced cancer risk. Two-step MR analysis identified very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) as a key mediator of the negative cause-effect relationship between AD and cancer. Colocalization analysis uncovered PVRIG upregulation to be a risk factor for AD. Transcriptomic analysis showed that PVRIG expression had significant negative correlations with stemness scores, and positive correlations with antitumor immune responses and overall survival in pan-cancer and multiple cancer types. Conclusion AD may result in lower cancer risk. VLDL is a significant intermediate variable linking AD with cancer. PVRIG abundance is a risk factor for AD but a protective factor for cancer. This study demonstrates a causal influence for AD on cancer and provides potential molecular connections between both diseases.

Background. Although transcriptomic data have been widely applied to explore various diseases, few studies have investigated the association between transcriptomic perturbations and disease development in a wide variety of diseases. Methods. Based on a previously developed algorithm for quantifying intratumor heterogeneity at the transcriptomic level, we defined the variation of transcriptomic perturbations (VTP) of a disease relative to the health status. Based on publicly available transcriptome datasets, we compared VTP values between the disease and health status and analyzed correlations between VTP values and disease progression or severity in various diseases, including neurological disorders, infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, liver diseases, kidney diseases, digestive diseases, and endocrine diseases. We also identified the genes and pathways whose expression perturbations correlated positively with VTP across diverse diseases. Results. VTP values were upregulated in various diseases relative to their normal controls. VTP values were significantly greater in define than in possible or probable Alzheimer’s disease. VTP values were significantly larger in intensive care unit (ICU) COVID-19 patients than in non-ICU patients, and in COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support (MVS) than in those not requiring MVS. VTP correlated positively with viral loads in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients. Moreover, the AIDS patients treated with abacavir or zidovudine had lower VTP values than those without such therapies. In pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients, VTP values followed the pattern: active TB > latent TB > normal controls. VTP values were greater in clinically apparent than in presymptomatic malaria. VTP correlated negatively with the cardiac index of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), VTP showed a negative correlation with forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1). VTP values increased with H. pylori infection and were upregulated in atrophic gastritis caused by H. pylori infection. The genes and pathways whose expression perturbations correlated positively with VTP scores across diseases were mainly involved in the regulation of immune, metabolic, and cellular activities. Conclusions. VTP is upregulated in the disease versus health status, and its upregulation is associated with disease progression and severity in various diseases. Thus, VTP has potential clinical implications for disease diagnosis and prognosis.