Objective: This study aims to determine how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition techniques and calculation methods affect T2 values of knee cartilage at 1.5 tesla and to identify sequences that can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping in short scanning times. Materials and Methods: This study was performed on phantom and 29 patients who underwent MRI of the knee joint at 1.5 tesla. The protocol includes T2 mapping sequences based on Single-Echo Spin Echo (SESE), Multi-Echo Spin Echo (MESE), Fast Spin Echo (FSE) and Turbo Gradient Spin Echo (TGSE). The T2 relaxation times were quantified and evaluated using three calculation methods (MapIt, Syngo Offline and mono-exponential fit). signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were measured in all sequences. All statistical analyses were performed using the t-test. Results: The average T2 values in phantom were 41.7 ± 13.8 ms for SESE, 43.2 ± 14.4 ms for MESE, 42.4 ± 14.1 ms for FSE and 44 ± 14.5 ms for TGSE. In the patient study, the mean differences were 6.5 ± 8.2 ms, 7.8 ± 7.6 ms and 8.4 ± 14.2 ms for MESE, FSE and TGSE compared to SESE, respectively; these statistical results were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The comparison between the three calculation methods showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The t-test showed no significant difference between SNR values for all sequences. Conclusion: T2 values depend not only on the sequence type but also on the calculation method. None of the sequences revealed significant differences compared to the SESE reference sequence. TGSE with its short scanning time can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare T1 and T2 relaxation times of normal and pathologic Achilles Tendon (AT) in order to evaluate the ability of these methods to detect early Achilles tendon tendinosis. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight subjects were included in this study. Twenty-two subjects were classified as normal group and twenty-six subjects as patient group with tendinosis. MR examination was performed by 3 Tesla scanner using a 12 channel head coil. For relaxation times quantification, we used a sagittal 3D FLASH variable flip angle gradient echo UTE sequence (3D VFA-GE UTE) for T1 mapping and a sagittal Multi Echo Spin Echo sequence (MESE) for T2 mapping. Relaxation times were quantified using two different algorithms written in MATLAB. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Our results showed a statistically significant difference in T1 and T2 values for the normal group compared to the patient group (p<0.05). Mean values of T1 and T2 were 571.69 ms and 24.16 ms for the normal group and 818.10 ms and 32.43 ms for the patient group, respectively. Results reported no correlation (r=0.193) for T1 mapping and a positive significant moderate correlation (r=0.542, p=0.000) for T2 mapping between the normal and patient groups. T1 and T2 showed no correlation in the normal group (r= 0.091, p=0.489) and a positive significant weak correlation in the patient group (r=0.263, p=0.048). Conclusion: We concluded that T1 and T2 relaxation times are relatively sensitive to diagnosis degenerative changes in the AT and T1 is more sensitive to AT tendinosis compared to T2.

Background: Recently, several studies have shown that T2 and T2* MRI parametric mapping are sensitive to structural and biochemical changes in the extracellular cartilage matrix. The objective of this study was to assess, compare and correlate quantitative T2 and T2* relaxation time of the knee articular cartilage at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3 Tesla. Methods: Thirty-eight symptomatic patients with knee articular cartilage disease and forty-one asymptomatic volunteers were prospectively included in the study. Knee MRI examination was performed by 3 T and 1.5 T scanner. Multi-Echo Spin-Echo (MESE) and Multi-Echo Gradient Echo (MEGE) sequences were used to determine T2* and T2 maps. T2 and T2* relaxation times values were measured in three Regions Of Itnterest (ROI) on knee articular cartilage using mono-exponential analysis fitting algorithm. Results: There was a significant difference between volunteers and patients for T2 and T2* relaxation times values at 1.5 T and 3 T (p<0.05). The comparison between magnetic fields has shown lower T2 and T2* relaxation times at 3 T compared to 1.5 T. Pearson’s correlation analysis between T2 and T2* at 1.5T revealed a significant positive correlation for volunteers (r=0.245, p = 0.01) and a significant negative correlation for patients (0.016, p = 0.018). At 3T, there was a significant positive correlation between T2 and T2* for volunteers (r=0.076) and patients (r=0.165). The correlation of T2 and T2* between 1.5 T and 3T showed a significant negative correlation (r=-0.087, p = 0.01). Conclusion: T2* mapping may be used for the diagnosis of knee articular cartilage osteoarthritis with the advantage of relatively short scanning time, higher SNR, shorter echo times and the non-effect of the stimulated echo compared to T2 mapping.

No abstract

Purpose: To compare 3D high-resolution MRI sequences in term of contrast, Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), artefacts and cartilage thickness in knee articular cartilage at 1.5 T. Materials and methods: Fourteen healthy volunteers and seven patients underwent articular knee cartilage exam. The 3D sequences were VOLUME Imaging with Body Enhancement (VIBE), True Fast Imaging with Steady-state Precession (TRUEFISP), Dual Echo Steady State (DESS), Multi Echo Data Image Combination (MEDIC) and Sampling Perfection with Application optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE). For all 3D sequences, we measured contrast ratio between cartilage-bone and cartilage-meniscus, SNR and cartilage thickness. In addition, we quantified magnetic susceptibility and flow artifacts. Statistical analyses were performed using the t-test and P<0.005 was considered statistically significant. Results: Statistical results were significantly different (p>0.05). MEDIC and VIBE sequences showed the best contrast ratio between cartilage-meniscus (0.40 ± 0.14, p=0.000) and cartilage-bone (0.75 ± 0.4, p=0.022), respectively. TRUEFISP sequence showed the highest SNR (28.04 ± 14.05, p=0.000) whereas DESS sequence showed the lowest SNR (11.62 ± 3.99, p=0.000). VIBE sequence provided the highest cartilage thickness measurement compared to the remaining 3D sequences (2.0 ± 0.4 cm, IRR=75.33%, ICC=0.96). The quantification of magnetic susceptibility and flow artifacts revealed that TRUEFISP (IRR=59%, ICC=0.92) and SPACE (IRR=59%, ICC=0.96) sequences presented the highest artifacts compared to the others sequences. Conclusion: 3D high-resolution sequences provide knee articular cartilage imaging with high image quality in relatively short acquisition time. MEDIC and VIBE sequences showed the best contrast and the lowest magnetic susceptibility and flow artifacts, TRUEFISP and SPACE sequence showed the highest SNR but they are more sensitive to artifacts, DESS sequence showed medium contrast and VIBE sequence provided the highest cartilage thickness.